Literature DB >> 24274837

Pharmacoeconomics of depot antipsychotics for treating chronic schizophrenia in Sweden.

Thomas R Einarson, Colin Vicente, Roman Zilbershtein, Charles Piwko, Christel N Bø, Hanna Pudas, Rasmus Jensen, Michiel E H Hemels.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics for chronic schizophrenia in Sweden.
METHODS: A 1-year decision tree was developed for Sweden using published data and expert opinion. Five treatment strategies lasting 1 year were compared: paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI), olanzapine pamoate (OLZ-LAI), risperidone (RIS-LAI), haloperidol decanoate (HAL-LAI) and olanzapine tablets (oral-OLZ). Patients intolerant/failing drugs switched to another depot; subsequent failures received clozapine. Resources and employment time lost (indirect costs) were costed in 2011 Swedish kroner (SEK), from standard government lists. The model calculated the average cost/patient and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which were combined into incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Multivariate and 1-way sensitivity analyses tested model stability.
RESULTS: PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI had the lowest cost/patient (189,696 SEK) and highest QALYs (0.817), dominating in the base case. OLZ-LAI followed by PP-LAI cost 229,775 SEK (0.812 QALY), RIS-LAI followed by HAL-LAI cost 221,062 SEK (0.804 QALY), HAL-LAI followed by oral-OLZ cost 243,411 SEK (0.776 QALY), and oral-OLZ followed by HAL-LAI cost 249,422 SEK (0.773 QALY). The greatest proportions of costs (52.5-83.8%) were for institutional care; indirect costs were minor (2.4-3.8%). RESULTS were sensitive to adherence and hospitalization rates, but not drug cost. PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI dominated OLZ-LAI followed by PP-LAI in 59.4% of simulations, RIS-LAI followed by HAL-LAI in 65.8%, HAL-LAI followed by oral-OLZ in 94.0% and oral-OLZ followed by HAL-LAI in 95.9%; PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI was dominated in 1.1% of the 40,000 iterations.
CONCLUSION: PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI was cost-effective in Sweden for chronic schizophrenia and cost-saving overall to the healthcare system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Olanzapine pamoate; Paliperidone palmitate; Pharmacoeconomic analysis; Schizophrenia; Sweden

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24274837     DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2013.852243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0803-9488            Impact factor:   2.202


  8 in total

1.  A Reasonable Alternative to Clozapine in the Chronically Relapsing Smoking Patient? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  John R Tomko; Nadeem Ahmed; Cynthia Kuntz; Justine Zick
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-11

2.  Invega Trinza: The First Four-Times-a-Year, Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agent.

Authors:  Noor Daghistani; Jose A Rey
Journal:  P T       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  The Cost of Relapse in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mark Pennington; Paul McCrone
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Costs and Resource Utilization Among Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Paliperidone Palmitate or Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Pesa; Erik Muser; Leslie B Montejano; David M Smith; Oren I Meyers
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2015-10-13

5.  Treatment continuation of four long-acting antipsychotic medications in the Netherlands and Belgium: A retrospective database study.

Authors:  Flore Decuypere; Jan Sermon; Paul Geerts; Tom R Denee; Cedric De Vos; Bart Malfait; Mark Lamotte; Cornelis L Mulder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Junwen Zhou; Aurélie Millier; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2018-08-14

7.  A systematic review of the indirect costs of schizophrenia in Europe.

Authors:  A Fasseeh; B Németh; A Molnár; F-U Fricke; M Horváth; K Kóczián; Á Götze; Z Kaló
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 8.  Systematic review of utility values used in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations for schizophrenia: implications on cost-effectiveness results.

Authors:  Junwen Zhou; Aurélie Millier; Clément François; Samuel Aballéa; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2019-08-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.