Literature DB >> 24274234

Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes.

Kathleen B McDermott1, Pooja K Agarwal1, Laura D'Antonio1, Henry L Roediger1, Mark A McDaniel1.   

Abstract

Practicing retrieval of recently studied information enhances the likelihood of the learner retrieving that information in the future. We examined whether short-answer and multiple-choice classroom quizzing could enhance retention of information on classroom exams taken for a grade. In seventh-grade science and high school history classes, students took intermittent quizzes (short-answer or multiple-choice, both with correct-answer feedback) on some information, whereas other information was not initially quizzed but received equivalent coverage in all other classroom activities. On the unit exams and on an end-of-semester exam, students performed better for information that had been quizzed than that not quizzed. An unanticipated and key finding is that the format of the quiz (multiple-choice or short-answer) did not need to match the format of the criterial test (e.g., unit exam) for this benefit to emerge. Further, intermittent quizzing cannot be attributed to intermittent reexposure to the target facts: A restudy condition produced less enhancement of later test performance than did quizzing with feedback. Frequent classroom quizzing with feedback improves student learning and retention, and multiple-choice quizzing is as effective as short-answer quizzing for this purpose.
© 2013 American Psychological Association

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24274234     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  16 in total

Review 1.  How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain.

Authors:  Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 2.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

4.  Impact of Spacing of Practice on Learning Brand Name and Generic Drugs.

Authors:  James Terenyi; Heidi Anksorus; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

Review 6.  Using Testing as a Learning Tool.

Authors:  Brenda W Yang; Juan Razo; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Teacher assessments during compulsory education are as reliable, stable and heritable as standardized test scores.

Authors:  Kaili Rimfeld; Margherita Malanchini; Laurie J Hannigan; Philip S Dale; Rebecca Allen; Sara A Hart; Robert Plomin
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  Medical student web-based formative assessment tool for renal pathology.

Authors:  Vanesa Bijol; Cathryn J Byrne-Dugan; Melanie P Hoenig
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 9.  Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?

Authors:  Richard J Hift
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The Testing Effect and Far Transfer: The Role of Exposure to Key Information.

Authors:  Gerdien G van Eersel; Peter P J L Verkoeijen; Migle Povilenaite; Remy Rikers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.