Plant ionomes and soil nutrients are commonly diagnosed in agronomy using concentration and nutrient ratio ranges. However, both diagnoses are biased by redundancy of information, subcompositional incoherence and non-normal distribution inherent to compositional data, potentially leading to conflicting results and wrong inferences. Our objective was to present an unbiased statistical approach of plant nutrient diagnosis using a balance concept and mango (Mangifera indica) as test crop. We collected foliar samples at flowering stage in 175 mango orchards. The ionomes comprised 11 nutrients (S, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, B, Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe). Traditional multivariate methods were found to be biased. Ionomes were thus represented by unbiased balances computed as isometric log ratios (ilr). Soil fertility attributes (pH and bioavailable nutrients) were transformed into balances to conduct discriminant analysis. The orchards differed more from genotype than soil nutrient signatures. A customized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) iterative procedure was developed to classify tissue ionomes between balanced/misbalanced and high/low-yielders. The ROC partitioning procedure showed that the critical Mahalanobis distance of 4.08 separating balanced from imbalanced specimens about yield cut-off of 128.5 kg fruit tree(-1) proved to be a fairly informative test (area under curve = 0.84-0.92). The [P | N,S] and [Mn | Cu,Zn] balances were found to be potential sources of misbalance in the less productive orchards, and should thus be further investigated in field experiments. We propose using a coherent pan balance diagnostic method with median ilr values of top yielders centered at fulcrums of a mobile and the critical Mahalanobis distance as a guide for global nutrient balance. Nutrient concentrations in weighing pans assisted appreciating nutrients as relative shortage, adequacy or excess in balances.
Plant ionomes and soil nutrients are commonly diagnosed in agronomy using concentration and nutrient ratio ranges. However, both diagnoses are biased by redundancy of information, subcompositional incoherence and non-normn>an class="Chemical">al distribution inherent to compositional data, potentially leading to conflicting results and wrong inferences. Our objective was to present an unbiased statistical approach of plant nutrient diagnosis using a balance concept and mango (Mangifera indica) as test crop. We collected foliar samples at flowering stage in 175 mango orchards. The ionomes comprised 11 nutrients (S, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, B, Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe). Traditional multivariate methods were found to be biased. Ionomes were thus represented by unbiased balances computed as isometric log ratios (ilr). Soil fertility attributes (pH and bioavailable nutrients) were transformed into balances to conduct discriminant analysis. The orchards differed more from genotype than soil nutrient signatures. A customized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) iterative procedure was developed to classify tissue ionomes between balanced/misbalanced and high/low-yielders. The ROC partitioning procedure showed that the critical Mahalanobis distance of 4.08 separating balanced from imbalanced specimens about yield cut-off of 128.5 kg fruit tree(-1) proved to be a fairly informative test (area under curve = 0.84-0.92). The [P | N,S] and [Mn | Cu,Zn] balances were found to be potential sources of misbalance in the less productive orchards, and should thus be further investigated in field experiments. We propose using a coherent pan balance diagnostic method with median ilr values of top yielders centered at fulcrums of a mobile and the critical Mahalanobis distance as a guide for global nutrient balance. Nutrient concentrations in weighing pans assisted appreciating nutrients as relative shortage, adequacy or excess in balances.
Entities:
Keywords:
compositional data analysis; crop management; ionomics; mango; plant nutrition
Authors: Brett Lahner; Jiming Gong; Mehrzad Mahmoudian; Ellen L Smith; Khush B Abid; Elizabeth E Rogers; Mary L Guerinot; Jeffrey F Harper; John M Ward; Lauren McIntyre; Julian I Schroeder; David E Salt Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-08-31 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: John Jairo Franco-Hermida; María Fernanda Quintero; Raúl Iskander Cabrera; José Miguel Guzman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Henrique A Souza; Serge-Étienne Parent; Danilo E Rozane; Daniel A Amorim; Viviane C Modesto; William Natale; Leon E Parent Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Rodrigo H D Nowaki; Serge-Étienne Parent; Arthur B Cecílio Filho; Danilo E Rozane; Natália B Meneses; Juliana A Dos Santos da Silva; William Natale; Léon E Parent Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: José Aridiano Lima de Deus; Júlio César Lima Neves; Márcio Cleber de Medeiros Corrêa; Serge-Étienne Parent; William Natale; Léon Etienne Parent Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 4.379