Literature DB >> 24273011

Climate-driven uncertainties in modeling terrestrial energy and water fluxes: a site-level to global-scale analysis.

Rahul Barman1, Atul K Jain, Miaoling Liang.   

Abstract

We used a land surface model constrained using data from flux tower sites, to analyze the biases in ecosystem energy and water fluxes arising due to the use of meteorological reanalysis datasets. Following site-level model calibration encompassing major vegetation types from the tropics to the northern high-latitudes, we repeated the site and global simulations using two reanalysis datasets: the NCEP/NCAR and the CRUNCEP. In comparison with the model simulations using observed meteorology from sites, the reanalysis-driven simulations produced several systematic biases in net radiation (Rn ), latent heat (LE), and sensible heat (H) fluxes. These include: (i) persistently positive tropical/subtropical biases in Rn using the NCEP/NCAR, and gradually transitioning to negative Rn biases in the higher latitudes; (ii) large positive H biases in the tropics/subtropics using the NCEP/NCAR; (iii) negative LE biases using the NCEP/NCAR above 40°N; (iv) high tropical LE using the CRUNCEP in comparison with observationally derived global estimates; and (v) flux-partitioning biases from canopy and ground components. Across vegetation types, we investigated the role of the meteorological drivers (shortwave and longwave radiation, atmospheric humidity, temperature, precipitation) and their seasonal biases in controlling these reanalysis-driven uncertainties. At the global scale, our site-level analysis explains several model-data differences in the LE and H fluxes when compared with observationally derived global estimates of these fluxes. Using our results, we discuss the implications of site-level model calibration on subsequent regional/global applications to study energy and hydrological processes. The flux-partitioning biases presented in this study have potential implications on the couplings among terrestrial carbon, energy, and water fluxes, and for the calibration of land-atmosphere parameterizations that are dependent on LE/H partitioning.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosphere; FLUXNET; ISAM, land surface model; biogeophysics; energy cycle; latent heat; sensible heat; uncertainties

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24273011     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  2 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Dynamics of Stomatal Behavior: Modeling and Implications for Photosynthesis and Water Use.

Authors:  Silvere R M Vialet-Chabrand; Jack S A Matthews; Lorna McAusland; Michael R Blatt; Howard Griffiths; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The FLUXCOM ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes.

Authors:  Martin Jung; Sujan Koirala; Ulrich Weber; Kazuhito Ichii; Fabian Gans; Gustau Camps-Valls; Dario Papale; Christopher Schwalm; Gianluca Tramontana; Markus Reichstein
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.