Literature DB >> 24272030

Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence.

K M Galotti1.   

Abstract

Sixty-four undergraduates wrote responses to the question, "When faced with a moral dilemma, what issues or concerns influence your decision?" The responses were coded according to one or more of 13 themes by independent raters blind to the subjects' gender. Six of the themes were identified as "feminine" themes and seven as "masculine" themes on the basis of previous work by Gilligan ([1982],In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Kohlberg ([1976], "Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach," in Lickona, T. [ed.],Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and social Issues, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), and others. Only one association between gender and the presence of any given theme reached statistical significance: Thus, there is little evidence to support the idea that men and women differ in their reports of how they think about moral dilemmas. For all subjects, the average proportion of possible feminine themes in a response was higher than the proportion of possible masculine themes. This finding supports the idea than an exclusive focus on themes such as rights and responsibilities will fail to capture many of the considerations all subjects regard as most important.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 24272030     DOI: 10.1007/BF02132782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Youth Adolesc        ISSN: 0047-2891


  3 in total

1.  Sex differences in moral internalization and values.

Authors:  M L Hoffman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Sex differences in moral reasoning: response to Walker's (1984) conclusion that there are none.

Authors:  D Baumrind
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1986-04

3.  Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments.

Authors:  K M Galotti; S F Kozberg
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  1987-08
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Gender and developmental differences in adolescents' conceptions of moral reasoning.

Authors:  K M Galotti; S F Kozberg; M C Farmer
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  1991-02

2.  Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Keith J Yoder
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.083

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.