Literature DB >> 24271506

Three-mode factor analysis by means of Candecomp/Parafac.

Alwin Stegeman1, Tam T T Lam.   

Abstract

A three-mode covariance matrix contains covariances of N observations (e.g., subject scores) on J variables for K different occasions or conditions. We model such an JK×JK covariance matrix as the sum of a (common) covariance matrix having Candecomp/Parafac form, and a diagonal matrix of unique variances. The Candecomp/Parafac form is a generalization of the two-mode case under the assumption of parallel factors. We estimate the unique variances by Minimum Rank Factor Analysis. The factors can be chosen oblique or orthogonal. Our approach yields a model that is easy to estimate and easy to interpret. Moreover, the unique variances, the factor covariance matrix, and the communalities are guaranteed to be proper, a percentage of explained common variance can be obtained for each variable-condition combination, and the estimated model is rotationally unique under mild conditions. We apply our model to several datasets in the literature, and demonstrate our estimation procedure in a simulation study.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271506     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9359-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

Review 1.  Three-way component analysis: principles and illustrative application.

Authors:  H A Kiers; I Van Mechelen
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-03

2.  Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.

Authors:  Pieter M Kroonenberg; Frans J Oort
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: a numerical convex hull based method.

Authors:  Eva Ceulemans; Henk A L Kiers
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods.

Authors:  Michael Eid; Fridtjof W Nussbeck; Christian Geiser; David A Cole; Mario Gollwitzer; Tanja Lischetzke
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-09

6.  A note on invariance in three-mode factor analysis.

Authors:  B Bloxom
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis.

Authors:  L R Tucker
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal Explained For Several Three-Sliced Arrays With A Two-Valued Typical Rank.

Authors:  Alwin Stegeman
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  On the Non-Existence of Optimal Solutions and the Occurrence of "Degeneracy" in the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC Model.

Authors:  Wim P Krijnen; Theo K Dijkstra; Alwin Stegeman
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.500

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Simultaneous Component Analysis by Means of Tucker3.

Authors:  Alwin Stegeman
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Belief in a just what? Demystifying just world beliefs by distinguishing sources of justice.

Authors:  Katherine Stroebe; Tom Postmes; Susanne Täuber; Alwin Stegeman; Melissa-Sue John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Factor Uniqueness of the Structural Parafac Model.

Authors:  Paolo Giordani; Roberto Rocci; Giuseppe Bove
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.