PURPOSE: We examined the development of osteoarthritis (OA) and post-traumatic bone loss after surgery for tibial plateau fractures (TPF). METHODS: Patients who had participated in previous follow-up (FU) examinations after TPF and primary reduction and internal fixation were re-evaluated. At the first FU, a median of three years after the accident (short-term FU), the patients underwent functional assessments and standardised X-rays to grade radiological OA and post-traumatic bone loss. At the second FU, a median of 22 years after the accident (long-term FU), 30 patients were available. An identical protocol was applied, and additional investigations [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the injured knee] were performed. RESULTS: When the subjective and objective results at first FU were compared with those of the second FU for the same patients, deterioration of symptoms, signs and radiological OA was noted; however, ten patients had no OA even after the long-term FU. Some patients developed post-traumatic bone loss. In 13 of 31 knees, there was little or no radiological evidence of bone loss at the second FU. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term FU examination results after TPF have little prognostic value for the individual patient, as good results may deteriorate over the long run; however, there were some knees with no OA at the long-term FU. This is the first report focusing on post-traumatic bone loss after TPF.
PURPOSE: We examined the development of osteoarthritis (OA) and post-traumatic bone loss after surgery for tibial plateau fractures (TPF). METHODS:Patients who had participated in previous follow-up (FU) examinations after TPF and primary reduction and internal fixation were re-evaluated. At the first FU, a median of three years after the accident (short-term FU), the patients underwent functional assessments and standardised X-rays to grade radiological OA and post-traumatic bone loss. At the second FU, a median of 22 years after the accident (long-term FU), 30 patients were available. An identical protocol was applied, and additional investigations [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the injured knee] were performed. RESULTS: When the subjective and objective results at first FU were compared with those of the second FU for the same patients, deterioration of symptoms, signs and radiological OA was noted; however, ten patients had no OA even after the long-term FU. Some patients developed post-traumatic bone loss. In 13 of 31 knees, there was little or no radiological evidence of bone loss at the second FU. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term FU examination results after TPF have little prognostic value for the individual patient, as good results may deteriorate over the long run; however, there were some knees with no OA at the long-term FU. This is the first report focusing on post-traumatic bone loss after TPF.
Authors: C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Matthieu Ehlinger; Benjamin Adamczewski; Michel Rahmé; Philippe Adam; Francois Bonnomet Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-03-08 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Konstantinos Kateros; Spyridon P Galanakos; Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Stamatios A Papadakis; George A Macheras Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2018 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.251
Authors: Bruno Gonçalves Schröder E Souza; Thiago Avelino Leite; Tarsis Aparecido Bueno da Silva; Carlos Otavio Fabiano de Faria Candido; Felipe Freesz de Almeida; Valdeci Manoel de Oliveira Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Georg Mattiassich; Ernst Foltin; Martin Pietsch; Oliver Djahani; Albert Kröpfl; Martin Fischmeister; Georg Scheurecker Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 2.362