Literature DB >> 24271165

Evaluation of phytate-degrading Lactobacillus culture administration to broiler chickens.

Tyler E Askelson1, Ashley Campasino, Jason T Lee, Tri Duong.   

Abstract

Probiotics have been demonstrated to promote growth, stimulate immune responses, and improve food safety of poultry. While widely used, their effectiveness is mixed, and the mechanisms through which they contribute to poultry production are not well understood. Microbial phytases are increasingly supplemented in feed to improve digestibility and reduce antinutritive effects of phytate. The microbial origin of these exogenous enzymes suggests a potentially important mechanism of probiotic functionality. We investigated phytate degradation as a novel probiotic mechanism using recombinant Lactobacillus cultures expressing Bacillus subtilis phytase. B. subtilis phyA was codon optimized for expression in Lactobacillus and cloned into the expression vector pTRK882. The resulting plasmid, pTD003, was transformed into Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, and Lactobacillus gasseri. SDS-PAGE revealed a protein in the culture supernatants of Lactobacillus pTD003 transformants with a molecular weight similar to that of the B. subtilis phytase. Expression of B. subtilis phytase increased phytate degradation of L. acidophilus, L. gasseri, and L. gallinarum approximately 4-, 10-, and 18-fold over the background activity of empty-vector transformants, respectively. Phytase-expressing L. gallinarum and L. gasseri were administered to broiler chicks fed a phosphorus-deficient diet. Phytase-expressing L. gasseri improved weight gain of broiler chickens to a level comparable to that for chickens fed a control diet adequate in phosphorus, demonstrating proof of principle that administration of phytate-degrading probiotic cultures can improve performance of livestock animals. This will inform future studies investigating whether probiotic cultures are able to provide both the performance benefits of feed enzymes and the animal health and food safety benefits traditionally associated with probiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271165      PMCID: PMC3911189          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03155-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  76 in total

Review 1.  Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research.

Authors:  Jens Walter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of Bacillus species as potential candidates for direct-fed microbials in commercial poultry.

Authors:  S Shivaramaiah; N R Pumford; M J Morgan; R E Wolfenden; A D Wolfenden; A Torres-Rodríguez; B M Hargis; G Téllez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics.

Authors:  G R Gibson; M B Roberfroid
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Selection and use of phytate-degrading LAB to improve cereal-based products by mineral solubilization during dough fermentation.

Authors:  Marilena Anastasio; Olimpia Pepe; Teresa Cirillo; Simona Palomba; Giuseppe Blaiotta; Francesco Villani
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Localized delivery of interferon-β by Lactobacillus exacerbates experimental colitis.

Authors:  Adelle P McFarland; Ram Savan; Sagie Wagage; Augustina Addison; Karthika Ramakrishnan; Megan Karwan; Tri Duong; Howard A Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Selection of lactobacilli for chicken probiotic adjuncts.

Authors:  M Garriga; M Pascual; J M Monfort; M Hugas
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Analysis of the genome sequence of Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323 reveals the molecular basis of an autochthonous intestinal organism.

Authors:  M Andrea Azcarate-Peril; Eric Altermann; Yong Jun Goh; Richard Tallon; Rosemary B Sanozky-Dawes; Erika A Pfeiler; Sarah O'Flaherty; B Logan Buck; Alleson Dobson; Tri Duong; Michael J Miller; Rodolphe Barrangou; Todd R Klaenhammer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  The effect of dietary phytase on growth performance and phosphorus utilization of broiler chicks.

Authors:  K M Perney; A H Cantor; M L Straw; K L Herkelman
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge.

Authors:  M Mohamadzadeh; T Duong; S J Sandwick; T Hoover; T R Klaenhammer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Phytase activity in sourdough lactic acid bacteria: purification and characterization of a phytase from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1.

Authors:  Maria De Angelis; Giovanna Gallo; Maria Rosaria Corbo; Paul L H McSweeney; Michele Faccia; Marinella Giovine; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 5.277

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics or pro-healers: the role of beneficial bacteria in tissue repair.

Authors:  Jovanka Lukic; Vivien Chen; Ivana Strahinic; Jelena Begovic; Hadar Lev-Tov; Stephen C Davis; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Irena Pastar
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Federico Sirri; Gerardo Manfreda; Paola Moniaci; Alberto Giardini; Marco Zampiga; Adele Meluzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Inclusion of Lactobacillus salivarius strain revealed a positive effect on improving growth performance, fecal microbiota and immunological responses in chicken.

Authors:  Shanmugam Sureshkumar; Hwi Cheul Lee; Sun Keun Jung; Dongjun Kim; Keon Bong Oh; Hyeon Yang; Yong Jin Jo; Hae Sun Lee; Sukchan Lee; Sung June Byun
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Use of Lactobacilli in Cereal-Legume Fermentation and as Potential Probiotics towards Phytate Hydrolysis.

Authors:  Girish K Amritha; G Venkateswaran
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Probiotic Validation of a Non-native, Thermostable, Phytase-Producing Bacterium: Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Paul Priyodip; Seetharaman Balaji
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Phytase-Producing Potential and Other Functional Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates for Prospective Probiotic Applications.

Authors:  Syed Tabia Andrabi; Bilqeesa Bhat; Mahak Gupta; Bijender Kumar Bajaj
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Genetic and Phenotypic Characteristics of a Multi-strain Probiotic for Broilers.

Authors:  Deon P Neveling; Jayesh J Ahire; Wikus Laubscher; Marina Rautenbach; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Microbial degradation of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6): specificity, kinetics, and simulation.

Authors:  Paul Priyodip; Seetharaman Balaji
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Biological Activities of Lactose-Based Prebiotics and Symbiosis with Probiotics on Controlling Osteoporosis, Blood-Lipid and Glucose Levels.

Authors:  Arijit Nath; Máté András Molnár; Attila Csighy; Kornélia Kőszegi; Ildikó Galambos; Klára Pásztorné Huszár; András Koris; Gyula Vatai
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Coexpression and secretion of endoglucanase and phytase genes in Lactobacillus reuteri.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yuxin Yang; Bei Cai; Pinghua Cao; Mingming Yang; Yulin Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.