Literature DB >> 24271061

Encoding certainty in bump attractors.

Sam Carroll1, Krešimir Josić, Zachary P Kilpatrick.   

Abstract

Persistent activity in neuronal populations has been shown to represent the spatial position of remembered stimuli. Networks that support bump attractors are often used to model such persistent activity. Such models usually exhibit translational symmetry. Thus activity bumps are neutrally stable, and perturbations in position do not decay away. We extend previous work on bump attractors by constructing model networks capable of encoding the certainty or salience of a stimulus stored in memory. Such networks support bumps that are not only neutrally stable to perturbations in position, but also perturbations in amplitude. Possible bump solutions then lie on a two-dimensional attractor, determined by a continuum of positions and amplitudes. Such an attractor requires precisely balancing the strength of recurrent synaptic connections. The amplitude of activity bumps represents certainty, and is determined by the initial input to the system. Moreover, bumps with larger amplitudes are more robust to noise, and over time provide a more faithful representation of the stored stimulus. In networks with separate excitatory and inhibitory populations, generating bumps with a continuum of possible amplitudes, requires tuning the strength of inhibition to precisely cancel background excitation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271061     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-013-0486-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  50 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity.

Authors:  X J Wang
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  The mechanism of orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex without a functional map.

Authors:  David Hansel; Carl van Vreeswijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory.

Authors:  Susheel Vijayraghavan; Min Wang; Shari G Birnbaum; Graham V Williams; Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A master equation formalism for macroscopic modeling of asynchronous irregular activity states.

Authors:  Sami El Boustani; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 5.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1994-10

Review 7.  Probabilistic interpretation of population codes.

Authors:  R S Zemel; P Dayan; A Pouget
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Destruction and creation of spatial tuning by disinhibition: GABA(A) blockade of prefrontal cortical neurons engaged by working memory.

Authors:  S G Rao; G V Williams; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stimulus selectivity in dorsal and ventral prefrontal cortex after training in working memory tasks.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Xue-Lian Qi; Terrence R Stanford; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  5 in total

1.  Balanced cortical microcircuitry for spatial working memory based on corrective feedback control.

Authors:  Sukbin Lim; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Synaptic efficacy shapes resource limitations in working memory.

Authors:  Nikhil Krishnan; Daniel B Poll; Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  A dynamic neural field model of continuous input integration.

Authors:  Weronika Wojtak; Stephen Coombes; Daniele Avitabile; Estela Bicho; Wolfram Erlhagen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network's Response to Conflicting External Inputs.

Authors:  Kathryn Hedrick; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.300

5.  Synaptic mechanisms of interference in working memory.

Authors:  Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.