Literature DB >> 24270825

Dominance, overdominance and epistasis in Pisum sativum L.

W E Lönnig1.   

Abstract

Dominant genes are the main cause of the heterosis induced by fasciated mutants of different lines of Pisum sativum. Most of these cases were originally interpreted by different authors as examples of monogenic overdominance. Several not-closely-linked genes appear to have mutated simultaneously in most of the fasciated lines. Although fasciation itself is recessive, other mutant characters, such as lateness, increased stem length (number and length of internodes) and, in part, seed production per plant, show dominant inheritance. The latter two features are, however, to a considerable extent suppressed in the fasciated lines by unfavourable gene-interactions (epistasis). Crossing these lines with non-fasciated ones shows that the epistatic genes are recessive and the dominant genes are then no longer hindered in their action. By eliminating the epistatic genes from the genomes of fasciated lines by recombination, the heterosis phenomenon has been fixed on six independent occasions for different lines. The fasciata genes themselves were found to be the most probable cause of these cases of recessive epistasis. The question whether different kinds of fasciation affect heterosis differently is examined. Recessive epistasis and dominance explain most of the quantitative distinctions between the different hybrids. In addition, one example of heterosis between non-fasciated lines is given and the possible meaning of the overall results for plant breeding and population genetics is mentioned.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 24270825     DOI: 10.1007/BF00304005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  8 in total

1.  Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? II. Experimental results.

Authors:  R FALK
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design.

Authors:  H J MULLER; R FALK
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Role of very slightly deleterious mutations in molecular evolution and polymorphism.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  What Is "Heterosis"?

Authors:  G H Shull
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Gene-ecological investigations in Pisum mutants : Part 2: comparative performance in Germany and North India.

Authors:  W Gottschalk; M L Kaul
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  The distribution of heterozygosity in template and tropical species of Drosophila.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.588

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Authors:  W Kysely; J R Myers; P A Lazzeri; G B Collins; H J Jacobsen
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.