Literature DB >> 24270727

Revision surgery due to magnet dislocation in cochlear implant patients: an emerging complication.

Frederike Hassepass1, Vanessa Stabenau, Wolfgang Maier, Susan Arndt, Roland Laszig, Rainer Beck, Antje Aschendorff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the cause and effect of magnet dislocation in cochlear implant (CI) recipients requiring magnet revision surgery for treatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
INTERVENTIONS: Case reports from 1,706 CI recipients consecutively implanted from January 2000 to December 2011 were reviewed. The number of cases requiring magnet revision surgery was assessed.
RESULTS: Revision surgery involving magnet removal or replacement was indicated in 1.23% (21/1,706), of all CI recipients. Magnet dislocation occurring during magnetic resonance tomography (MRI), at 1.5 Tesla (T), with the magnet in place and with the application of compression bandaging around the head, was the main cause for revision surgery in 47.62% (10/21) of the affected cases. All 10 cases were implanted with Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implants. These events occurred, despite adherence to current recommendations of the manufacturer.
CONCLUSION: The present study underlines that MRI examination is the main cause of magnet dislocation. The use of compressive bandaging when using 1.5-T MRI does not eliminate the risk of magnet dislocation. Additional cautionary measures are for required for conditional MRI. We recommend X-ray examination after MRI to determine magnet dislocation and avoid major complications in all cases reporting pain during or after MRI. Additional research regarding silicon magnet pocket design for added retention is needed. Effective communication of guidelines for precautionary measures during MRI examination in CI patients is mandatory for all clinicians involved. MRI in CI recipients should be indicated with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24270727     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a5d2c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  16 in total

1.  [Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: German version].

Authors:  G Grupe; J Wagner; S Hofmann; A Stratmann; P Mittmann; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients : English version.

Authors:  G Grupe; J Wagner; S Hofmann; A Stratmann; P Mittmann; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.

Authors:  Martin Leinung; Andreas G Loth; Michaela Kroth; Iris Burck; Timo Stöver; Silke Helbig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  MRI-Based Estimation of Scalar Cochlear-Implant Electrode Position.

Authors:  A Stratmann; P Mittmann; G Rademacher; G Grupe; S Hoffmann; S Mutze; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Grit Rademacher; Gloria Grupe; Andreas Stratmann; Arne Ernst; Sven Mutze; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 10.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.