Literature DB >> 24270575

Cross-conjugation and quantum interference: a general correlation?

Hennie Valkenier1, Constant M Guédon, Troels Markussen, Kristian S Thygesen, Sense J van der Molen, Jan C Hummelen.   

Abstract

We discuss the relationship between the π-conjugation pattern, molecular length, and charge transport properties of molecular wires, both from an experimental and a theoretical viewpoint. Specifically, we focus on the role of quantum interference in the conductance properties of cross-conjugated molecules. For this, we compare experiments on two series of dithiolated wires. The first set we synthesized consists of three dithiolated oligo(phenylene ethynylene) (OPE) benchmark compounds with increasing length. The second series synthesized comprises three molecules with different π-conjugation patterns, but identical lengths, i.e. an anthracene (linear conjugation), an anthraquinone (cross-conjugation), and a dihydroanthracene (broken conjugation) derivative. To benchmark reliable trends, conductance experiments on these series have been performed by various techniques. Here, we compare data obtained by conductive-probe atomic force microscopy (CP-AFM) for self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) with single-molecule break junction and multi-molecule EGaIn data from other groups. For the benchmark OPE-series, we consistently find an exponential decay of the conductance with molecular length characterized by β = 0.37 ± 0.03 Å(-1) (CP-AFM). Remarkably, for the second series, we do not only find that the linearly conjugated anthracene-containing wire is the most conductive, but also that the cross-conjugated anthraquinone-containing wire is less conductive than the broken-conjugated derivative. We attribute the low conductance values for the cross-conjugated species to quantum interference effects. Moreover, by theoretical modeling, we show that destructive quantum interference is a robust feature for cross-conjugated structures and that the energy at which complete destructive interference occurs can be tuned by the choice of side group. The latter provides an outlook for future devices in this fascinating field connecting chemistry and physics.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24270575     DOI: 10.1039/c3cp53866d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  17 in total

1.  Large negative differential conductance in single-molecule break junctions.

Authors:  Mickael L Perrin; Riccardo Frisenda; Max Koole; Johannes S Seldenthuis; Jose A Celis Gil; Hennie Valkenier; Jan C Hummelen; Nicolas Renaud; Ferdinand C Grozema; Joseph M Thijssen; Diana Dulić; Herre S J van der Zant
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Effects of electronic coupling and electrostatic potential on charge transport in carbon-based molecular electronic junctions.

Authors:  Richard L McCreery
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Probing electron-phonon excitations in molecular junctions by quantum interference.

Authors:  C Bessis; M L Della Rocca; C Barraud; P Martin; J C Lacroix; T Markussen; P Lafarge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Conformation-driven quantum interference effects mediated by through-space conjugation in self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Marco Carlotti; Andrii Kovalchuk; Tobias Wächter; Xinkai Qiu; Michael Zharnikov; Ryan C Chiechi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Gating of Quantum Interference in Molecular Junctions by Heteroatom Substitution.

Authors:  Xunshan Liu; Sara Sangtarash; David Reber; Dan Zhang; Hatef Sadeghi; Jia Shi; Zong-Yuan Xiao; Wenjing Hong; Colin J Lambert; Shi-Xia Liu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Conductance in a bis-terpyridine based single molecular breadboard circuit.

Authors:  Charu Seth; Veerabhadrarao Kaliginedi; Sankarrao Suravarapu; David Reber; Wenjing Hong; Thomas Wandlowski; Frédéric Lafolet; Peter Broekmann; Guy Royal; Ravindra Venkatramani
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Synthesis and Single-Molecule Conductances of Neutral and Cationic Indenofluorene-Extended Tetrathiafulvalenes: Kondo Effect Molecules.

Authors:  Mads Mansø; Max Koole; Maarten Mulder; Ignacio J Olavarria-Contreras; Cecilie Lindholm Andersen; Martyn Jevric; Søren Lindbæk Broman; Anders Kadziola; Ole Hammerich; Herre S J van der Zant; Mogens Brøndsted Nielsen
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Tracking molecular resonance forms of donor-acceptor push-pull molecules by single-molecule conductance experiments.

Authors:  Henriette Lissau; Riccardo Frisenda; Stine T Olsen; Martyn Jevric; Christian R Parker; Anders Kadziola; Thorsten Hansen; Herre S J van der Zant; Mogens Brøndsted Nielsen; Kurt V Mikkelsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Transition voltages respond to synthetic reorientation of embedded dipoles in self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Andrii Kovalchuk; Tarek Abu-Husein; Davide Fracasso; David A Egger; Egbert Zojer; Michael Zharnikov; Andreas Terfort; Ryan C Chiechi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Controlling destructive quantum interference in tunneling junctions comprising self-assembled monolayers via bond topology and functional groups.

Authors:  Yanxi Zhang; Gang Ye; Saurabh Soni; Xinkai Qiu; Theodorus L Krijger; Harry T Jonkman; Marco Carlotti; Eric Sauter; Michael Zharnikov; Ryan C Chiechi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.