Literature DB >> 24270006

Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms.

I Lentacker1, I De Cock1, R Deckers2, S C De Smedt3, C T W Moonen2.   

Abstract

In the past two decades, research has underlined the potential of ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance drug delivery. However, there is less consensus on the biophysical and biological mechanisms leading to this enhanced delivery. Sonoporation, i.e. the formation of temporary pores in the cell membrane, as well as enhanced endocytosis is reported. Because of the variety of ultrasound settings used and corresponding microbubble behavior, a clear overview is missing. Therefore, in this review, the mechanisms contributing to sonoporation are categorized according to three ultrasound settings: i) low intensity ultrasound leading to stable cavitation of microbubbles, ii) high intensity ultrasound leading to inertial cavitation with microbubble collapse, and iii) ultrasound application in the absence of microbubbles. Using low intensity ultrasound, the endocytotic uptake of several drugs could be stimulated, while short but intense ultrasound pulses can be applied to induce pore formation and the direct cytoplasmic uptake of drugs. Ultrasound intensities may be adapted to create pore sizes correlating with drug size. Small molecules are able to diffuse passively through small pores created by low intensity ultrasound treatment. However, delivery of larger drugs such as nanoparticles and gene complexes, will require higher ultrasound intensities in order to allow direct cytoplasmic entry.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cavitation; Endocytosis; Microbubbles; Sonoporation; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24270006     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  140 in total

1.  Multiple sessions of liposomal doxorubicin delivery via focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain barrier disruption: a safety study.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Acoustofluidic sonoporation for gene delivery to human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Jason N Belling; Liv K Heidenreich; Zhenhua Tian; Alexandra M Mendoza; Tzu-Ting Chiou; Yao Gong; Natalie Y Chen; Thomas D Young; Natcha Wattanatorn; Jae Hyeon Park; Leonardo Scarabelli; Naihao Chiang; Jack Takahashi; Stephen G Young; Adam Z Stieg; Satiro De Oliveira; Tony Jun Huang; Paul S Weiss; Steven J Jonas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Ultrasound-responsive droplets for therapy: A review.

Authors:  H Lea-Banks; M A O'Reilly; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Stimulus-responsive liposomes as smart nanoplatforms for drug delivery applications.

Authors:  Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Soroush Mirkiani; Shayan Shahsavari; Behrad Masoudi; Maryam Masroor; Hamid Hamed; Zahra Jafari; Yasamin Davatgaran Taghipour; Hura Hashemi; Mahdi Karimi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanotechnol Rev       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 7.848

5.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Ruen Shan Leow; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Mukaddes Izci; Christy Maksoudian; Bella B Manshian; Stefaan J Soenen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Laser-Activated Polymeric Microcapsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: In Vitro Feasibility.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Tom van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Emilie Blazejewski; Gert Veldhuis; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Layered acoustofluidic resonators for the simultaneous optical and acoustic characterisation of cavitation dynamics, microstreaming, and biological effects.

Authors:  V Pereno; M Aron; O Vince; C Mannaris; A Seth; M de Saint Victor; G Lajoinie; M Versluis; C Coussios; D Carugo; E Stride
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Acoustic Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acids with Phase-Shift Nano-Emulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Ho; Chih-Chung Huang; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.