Literature DB >> 24268761

Bowel obstruction in recurrent gynecologic malignancies: defining who will benefit from surgical intervention.

T Perri1, J Korach2, G Ben-Baruch2, A Jakobson-Setton2, L Ben-David Hogen2, S Kalfon2, M Beiner2, L Helpman2, D Rosin3.   

Abstract

AIM: To define factors that could help select, in a cohort of gynecologic cancer patients with malignant gastro-intestinal obstruction, those most likely to benefit from palliative surgery.
METHODS: In this retrospective study of patients with malignant gastro-intestinal obstruction who underwent palliative surgery in our institute over 7 years, outcome measures were oral intake, chemotherapy, and 30-day, 60-day and overall survival. Based on Cox proportional-hazards regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests, a prognostic score was developed to identify those most likely to benefit from surgery.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight palliative surgeries were performed in 62 patients with ovarian (69.1%), primary-peritoneal (8.8%), cervical (11.8%) or uterine (10.3%) malignancies. Procedures were colostomy (26.5%), ileostomy (39.7%), colonic stent (1.5%), gastrostomy (7.3%), gastroenterostomy (5.9%) and bypass/resection and anastomosis (19.1%). Eighteen patients died prior to discharge, within 3-81 days (median 25 days). The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 14.7% and 29.4%, respectively. Postoperative oral-intake and chemotherapy rates were 65% and 53%, respectively, with albumin level identified on multivariate analysis as the only significant predictor of both. Median postoperative survival was 106 days (3-1342). Bypass/resection and anastomosis was associated with improved survival. Ascites below 2 L, younger age, ovarian primary tumor, and higher blood albumin correlated with longer postoperative survival. A prognostic index based on these factors was found to identify patients with increased 30-day and 60-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed prognostic index, based on age, primary tumor, albumin and ascites, might help select those gynecological cancer patients most likely to benefit from palliative surgery.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel surgery; Gynecological malignancies; Palliative care; Scoring system

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268761     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  4 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah E Cousins; Emma Tempest; David J Feuer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs for Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Lois M Ramondetta; Brian D Badgwell; Diane C Bodurka; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Malignant Bowel Obstruction Management Over Time: Are We Doing Anything New? A Current Narrative Review.

Authors:  Farhana Shariff; Jessica Bogach; Keegan Guidolin; Ashlie Nadler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Prognostic Factors for Surgical Failure in Malignant Bowel Obstruction and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Claudio Lodoli; Marcello Covino; Miriam Attalla El Halabieh; Francesco Santullo; Andrea Di Giorgio; Carlo Abatini; Stefano Rotolo; Elena Rodolfino; Francesco Giovinazzo; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Franceschi; Fabio Pacelli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.