BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≤15 mm Hg, given a normal left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). However, recent studies have shown that, in PAH patients, diagnosis based on PCWP can erroneously classify a significant number of patients compared with diagnosis based on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Therefore, we sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of end-expiratory PCWP and LVEDP measurements in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: We reviewed the hemodynamic data from 122 patients suspected of having PH who underwent simultaneous right- and left-side heart catheterizations at a PH referral center from 2006 to 2011. RESULTS: PH was diagnosed in 105 patients, 79% of whom (n = 83) showed a pre-capillary pattern according to the LVEDP measurement. Ninety percent of patients with PCWP ≤15 mm Hg were correctly classified as having pre-capillary PH. However, 39% of patients with a PCWP >15 mm Hg had LVEDP ≤15 mm Hg and would have been erroneously diagnosed with pulmonary venous hypertension based on their PCWP measurements alone. The sensitivity and specificity was 0.89 and 0.64, respectively. A Bland-Altman analysis of the PCWP and LVEDP measurements revealed a mean bias of 0.3 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement of -7.2 to 7.8 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: A PCWP ≤15 mm Hg was found to be a reliable indicator of normal LVFP in pre-capillary PH patients. When measured properly and analyzed in the clinical context, PCWP is a valuable tool for accurate diagnosis of PAH.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of ≤15 mm Hg, given a normal left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). However, recent studies have shown that, in PAH patients, diagnosis based on PCWP can erroneously classify a significant number of patients compared with diagnosis based on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Therefore, we sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of end-expiratory PCWP and LVEDP measurements in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: We reviewed the hemodynamic data from 122 patients suspected of having PH who underwent simultaneous right- and left-side heart catheterizations at a PH referral center from 2006 to 2011. RESULTS: PH was diagnosed in 105 patients, 79% of whom (n = 83) showed a pre-capillary pattern according to the LVEDP measurement. Ninety percent of patients with PCWP ≤15 mm Hg were correctly classified as having pre-capillary PH. However, 39% of patients with a PCWP >15 mm Hg had LVEDP ≤15 mm Hg and would have been erroneously diagnosed with pulmonary venous hypertension based on their PCWP measurements alone. The sensitivity and specificity was 0.89 and 0.64, respectively. A Bland-Altman analysis of the PCWP and LVEDP measurements revealed a mean bias of 0.3 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement of -7.2 to 7.8 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: A PCWP ≤15 mm Hg was found to be a reliable indicator of normal LVFP in pre-capillary PH patients. When measured properly and analyzed in the clinical context, PCWP is a valuable tool for accurate diagnosis of PAH.
Authors: Anna R Hemnes; Alexander R Opotowsky; Tufik R Assad; Meng Xu; Laura N Doss; Eric Farber-Eger; Quinn S Wells; Evan L Brittain Journal: Chest Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Julia Mascherbauer; Caroline Zotter-Tufaro; Franz Duca; Christina Binder; Matthias Koschutnik; Andreas A Kammerlander; Stefan Aschauer; Diana Bonderman Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Qi-Fang Huang; Sander Trenson; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Jan Van Keer; Lucas N L Van Aelst; Wen-Yi Yang; Esther Nkuipou-Kenfack; Lutgarde Thijs; Fang-Fei Wei; Blerim Mujaj; Agnieszka Ciarka; Walter Droogné; Johan Vanhaecke; Stefan Janssens; Johan Van Cleemput; Harald Mischak; Jan A Staessen Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2018-04-23
Authors: Stephan Rosenkranz; J Simon R Gibbs; Rolf Wachter; Teresa De Marco; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Jean-Luc Vachiéry Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 29.983