BACKGROUND: Anatomical and functional assessment of the collateral circulation of the heart in total arterial occlusions is challenging, and this is particularly true of the microcirculation. The pathophysiology of the collateral circulation has historically been and remains of considerable research focus but with diverging and sometimes conflicting results. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review on the assessment and pathophysiology of the collateral circulation of the heart in total coronary arterial occlusions. METHODS: We extracted data from Pubmed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from 1966 to December 2012. Two investigators independently reviewed the identified articles for eligibility and extracted the data. RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies met inclusion criterion. An invasive assessment of the collateral circulation with pressure and/or Doppler wires is the gold standard in the assessment of collateral physiology and anatomy, although this can only be undertaken after successful passage of the sensor in the true lumen of the occluded vessel. A collateral circulation can provide resting metabolic requirements for the heart but invariably cannot meet demands on stress irrespective of the degree of collateralization as assessed by coronary angiography. In the case of myocardium subtending a totally occluded epicardial artery coronary collateral grading systems or physiological assessment of collateral flow is only moderately sensitive and poorly specific at predicting viability. Regression of collaterals seems more profound in totally occluded arteries versus nonoccluded lesions postrevascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Key controversies in the assessment and pathophysiology of the collateral circulation of the heart in total coronary arterial occlusions are systematically evaluated.
BACKGROUND: Anatomical and functional assessment of the collateral circulation of the heart in total arterial occlusions is challenging, and this is particularly true of the microcirculation. The pathophysiology of the collateral circulation has historically been and remains of considerable research focus but with diverging and sometimes conflicting results. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review on the assessment and pathophysiology of the collateral circulation of the heart in total coronary arterial occlusions. METHODS: We extracted data from Pubmed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from 1966 to December 2012. Two investigators independently reviewed the identified articles for eligibility and extracted the data. RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies met inclusion criterion. An invasive assessment of the collateral circulation with pressure and/or Doppler wires is the gold standard in the assessment of collateral physiology and anatomy, although this can only be undertaken after successful passage of the sensor in the true lumen of the occluded vessel. A collateral circulation can provide resting metabolic requirements for the heart but invariably cannot meet demands on stress irrespective of the degree of collateralization as assessed by coronary angiography. In the case of myocardium subtending a totally occluded epicardial artery coronary collateral grading systems or physiological assessment of collateral flow is only moderately sensitive and poorly specific at predicting viability. Regression of collaterals seems more profound in totally occluded arteries versus nonoccluded lesions postrevascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Key controversies in the assessment and pathophysiology of the collateral circulation of the heart in total coronary arterial occlusions are systematically evaluated.
Authors: Cristiano Spadaccio; Francesco Nappi; Federico De Marco; Pietro Sedati; Chiara Taffon; Antonio Nenna; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo Chello; Marcella Trombetta; Ivancarmine Gambardella; Alberto Rainer Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.132