Literature DB >> 24268142

Physical explanation of coupled cell-cell rotational behavior and interfacial morphology: a particle dynamics model.

Fong Yew Leong1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported persistent rotational behavior between adherent cell-cell pairs cultured on micropatterned substrates, and this rotation is often accompanied by a sigmoidal deflection of the cell-cell interface. Interestingly, the cell-cell rotation runs in the opposite reference frame from what could be expected of single cell locomotion. Specifically, the rotation of the cell pair consists of each individual cell protruding from the inwardly regressive arm of the cell-cell interface, and retracting from the other outwardly protrusive arm. To this author's knowledge, the cause of this elusive behavior has not yet been clarified. Here, we propose a physical model based on particle dynamics, accounting for actomyosin forcing, viscous dissipation, and cortical tension. The results show that a correlation in actomyosin force vectors leads to both persistent rotational behavior and interfacial deflection in a simulated cell cluster. Significantly, the model, without any artificial cues, spontaneously and consistently reproduces the same rotational reference frame as experimentally observed. Further analyses show that the interfacial deflection depends predominantly on cortical tension, whereas the cluster rotation depends predominantly on actomyosin forcing. Together, these results corroborate the hypothesis that both rotational and morphological phenomena are, in fact, physically coupled by an intracellular torque of a common origin.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268142      PMCID: PMC3838736          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  33 in total

1.  Coherent angular motion in the establishment of multicellular architecture of glandular tissues.

Authors:  Kandice Tanner; Hidetoshi Mori; Rana Mroue; Alexandre Bruni-Cardoso; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Actin filament elasticity and retrograde flow shape the force-velocity relation of motile cells.

Authors:  Juliane Zimmermann; Claudia Brunner; Mihaela Enculescu; Michael Goegler; Allen Ehrlicher; Josef Käs; Martin Falcke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions.

Authors:  Manuel Théry
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Individual-based and continuum models of growing cell populations: a comparison.

Authors:  Helen Byrne; Dirk Drasdo
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Dissipative particle dynamics simulations for biological tissues: rheology and competition.

Authors:  Markus Basan; Jacques Prost; Jean-François Joanny; Jens Elgeti
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Collective cell migration: leadership, invasion and segregation.

Authors:  Alexandre J Kabla
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jennifer R Levy; Erika L F Holzbaur
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Collective cell streams in epithelial monolayers depend on cell adhesion.

Authors:  András Czirók; Katalin Varga; Előd Méhes; András Szabó
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.729

9.  Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells.

Authors:  Ambra Bianco; Minna Poukkula; Adam Cliffe; Juliette Mathieu; Carlos M Luque; Tudor A Fulga; Pernille Rørth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The forces behind cell movement.

Authors:  Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Allen Ehrlicher
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.580

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cells as strain-cued automata.

Authors:  Brian N Cox; Malcolm L Snead
Journal:  J Mech Phys Solids       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.471

2.  Polarity mechanisms such as contact inhibition of locomotion regulate persistent rotational motion of mammalian cells on micropatterns.

Authors:  Brian A Camley; Yunsong Zhang; Yanxiang Zhao; Bo Li; Eshel Ben-Jacob; Herbert Levine; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coherent motions in confluent cell monolayer sheets.

Authors:  Bo Li; Sean X Sun
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue.

Authors:  Brian A Camley; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Multi-Compartment Lymph-Node-on-a-Chip Enables Measurement of Immune Cell Motility in Response to Drugs.

Authors:  Nicholas Hallfors; Aya Shanti; Jiranuwat Sapudom; Jeremy Teo; Georg Petroianu; SungMun Lee; Lourdes Planelles; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31

6.  Coherent Motion of Monolayer Sheets under Confinement and Its Pathological Implications.

Authors:  S S Soumya; Animesh Gupta; Andrea Cugno; Luca Deseri; Kaushik Dayal; Dibyendu Das; Shamik Sen; Mandar M Inamdar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Modeling cell shape and dynamics on micropatterns.

Authors:  Philipp J Albert; Ulrich S Schwarz
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.405

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.