Literature DB >> 24267688

Asymmetric dopamine loss differentially affects effort to maximize gain or minimize loss.

Omer Porat1, Sharon Hassin-Baer2, Oren S Cohen2, Andrey Markus1, Rachel Tomer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dopamine (DA) plays an important role in regulating effort expenditure for reward, but whether it is also involved in modulating effort to avoid punishment is not clear. Preference for approach towards rewarding stimuli or away from aversive stimuli is associated with asymmetric activation in anterior brain regions. Asymmetric DA signaling in subcortical-frontal circuits may therefore contribute to differentially energizing behavior towards approach or avoidance behavior. We tested this hypothesis in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), characterized by asymmetric DA loss.
METHODS: Patients with greater DA deficit in the left (n = 20) or right (n = 19) hemisphere, performed a task that measures separately effort to approach (maximize gains) versus effort to avoid (minimize loss), on and off DA replacement therapy.
RESULTS: When tested off medication, patients with relatively greater DA deficit in the left hemisphere showed greater approach deficit (less effort to increase gain than to avoid loss) whereas the opposite pattern of effort expenditure was demonstrated by patients with greater DA deficit in the right hemisphere. Performing the same task when medicated revealed increased willingness to expend effort, such that increased effort to maximize gain was associated left hemisphere improved DA function (reflected by reduced symptoms), while increased effort to avoid loss was related to right hemisphere improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that asymmetry of DA levels modulates the differential exertion of effort toward attaining rewards versus avoiding aversive consequences, providing new insights into understanding the underlying pathophysiology of behavioral syndromes such as apathy and impulsive-compulsive disorders.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetry; Dopamine; Effort; Motivation; Parkinson's disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24267688     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  8 in total

1.  Dopamine-Dependent Loss Aversion during Effort-Based Decision-Making.

Authors:  Xiuli Chen; Sarah Voets; Ned Jenkinson; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Activational and effort-related aspects of motivation: neural mechanisms and implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Samantha E Yohn; Laura López-Cruz; Noemí San Miguel; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Love to win or hate to Lose? Asymmetry of dopamine D2 receptor binding predicts sensitivity to reward versus punishment.

Authors:  Rachel Tomer; Heleen A Slagter; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Mark A Gluck; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Local and distributed cortical markers of effort expenditure during sustained goal pursuit.

Authors:  Lauren M Patrick; Kevin M Anderson; Avram J Holmes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Dopamine enhances willingness to exert effort for reward in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Trevor T-J Chong; Valerie Bonnelle; Sanjay Manohar; Kai-Riin Veromann; Kinan Muhammed; George K Tofaris; Michele Hu; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Enhanced motivation of cognitive control in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Monique H M Timmer; Esther Aarts; Rianne A J Esselink; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Hypothesizing in the Face of the Opioid Crisis Coupling Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) Testing with Electrotherapeutic Nonopioid Modalities Such as H-Wave Could Attenuate Both Pain and Hedonic Addictive Behaviors.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Abdalla Bowirrat; Luis Llanos Gomez; David Baron; Igor Elman; John Giordano; Rehan Jalali; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; Edward J Modestino; Mark S Gold; Eric R Braverman; Anish Bajaj; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Distinct neural processes support post-success and post-error slowing in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Yihe Zhang; Jaime S Ide; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Nikola S Valchev; Xiaoying Tang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.590

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.