Literature DB >> 24267393

Eighteen-month-olds understand false beliefs in an unexpected-contents task.

David Buttelmann1, Harriet Over2, Malinda Carpenter3, Michael Tomasello4.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that infants understand that others can have false beliefs. However, most of these studies have used looking time measures, and the few that have used behavioral measures are all based on the change-of-location paradigm, leading to claims that infants might use behavioral rules instead of mental state understanding to pass these tests. We investigated infants' false-belief reasoning using a different paradigm. In this unexpected-contents helping task, 18-month-olds were familiarized with boxes for blocks that contained blocks. When an experimenter subsequently reached for a box for blocks that now contained a spoon, infants based their choice of whether to give her a spoon or a block on her true or false belief about which object the block box contained. These results help to demonstrate the flexibility of infants' false-belief understanding.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False belief; Goal understanding; Helping; Infancy; Prosocial behaviour; Theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24267393     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  11 in total

1.  Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Rose M Scott; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Joshua C Richman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Rethinking the Relationship between Social Experience and False-Belief Understanding: A Mentalistic Account.

Authors:  Erin Roby; Rose M Scott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-03

4.  Calling for Careful Designs for the Evaluation of Interactive Behavioral Measures on Early False-Belief Reasoning.

Authors:  David Buttelmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 5.  Eye tracking uncovered great apes' ability to anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Satoshi Hirata; Josep Call
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 6.  Reviving pragmatic theory of theory of mind.

Authors:  Chiyoko Kobayashi Frank
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-20

7.  Pragmatics in the False-Belief Task: Let the Robot Ask the Question!

Authors:  Jean Baratgin; Marion Dubois-Sage; Baptiste Jacquet; Jean-Louis Stilgenbauer; Frank Jamet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 8.  Imagination and social cognition in childhood.

Authors:  Tamar Kushnir
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 9.  Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.

Authors:  Pamela Barone; Antoni Gomila
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-12-14

10.  Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Erin Roby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.