Literature DB >> 24267315

The English national low rectal cancer development programme: key messages and future perspectives.

B J Moran1, T Holm, G Brannagan, H Chave, P Quirke, N West, G Brown, R Glynne-Jones, D Sebag-Montefiore, C Cunningham, A Z Janjua, N J Battersby, S Crane, A McMeeking.   

Abstract

AIM: Adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum is clinically challenging because of the need to choose between a wide excision to achieve oncological clearance, on the one hand, and sphincter conservation to maintain anal function, on the other. The English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (LOREC) was developed under the auspices of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland and the English National Cancer Action Team to improve the outcome of low rectal cancer in England.
METHOD: LOREC was initiated focusing on preoperative imaging, selective neoadjuvant therapy, optimal surgical treatment and detailed pathological assessment of the excised specimen. Its key elements were 1-day multidisciplinary team (MDT) workshops, cadaveric surgical training, surgical mentoring, pathological audit and radiological workshops.
RESULTS: Overall, 147 (89.6%) of 164 MDTs from 151 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts (some with two MDTs) in England participated in 15 workshops in Basingstoke or Leeds. In addition, 112 surgeons attended a 1-day cadaveric training programme in Bristol, Newcastle or Nottingham, with the main focus on extralevator abdominoperineal excision and pelvic reconstruction, with input from anatomists and from colorectal and plastic surgeons.
CONCLUSION: Optimal staging, selective preoperative chemoradiotherapy and precise surgery were considered as crucial to improve the outcome for patients with low rectal cancer. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low rectal cancer; National MDT Programme

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24267315     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  15 in total

1.  Histopathological and radiological reporting in rectal cancer: concepts and controversies, facts and fantasies.

Authors:  S Balyasnikova; N Haboubi; B Moran; G Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Evolution of Surgical Treatment for Rectal Cancer: a Review.

Authors:  Sanjeev Dayal; Nick Battersby; Tom Cecil
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  How Is Rectal Cancer Managed: a Survey Exploring Current Practice Patterns in Canada.

Authors:  A Crawford; J Firtell; A Caycedo-Marulanda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-06

4.  Selective extra levator versus conventional abdomino perineal resection: experience from a tertiary-care center.

Authors:  Vishwas D Pai; Reena Engineer; Prachi S Patil; Supreeta Arya; Ashwin L Desouza; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Protocol for a multicentre randomised feasibility trial evaluating early Surgery Alone In LOw Rectal cancer (SAILOR).

Authors:  Dean A Harris; Kymberley Thorne; Hayley Hutchings; Saiful Islam; Gail Holland; Olivia Hatcher; Sarah Gwynne; Ian Jenkins; Peter Coyne; Michael Duff; Melanie Feldman; Des C Winter; Simon Gollins; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Gina Brown; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Alan Brown; John Beynon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cutaneous Stomal Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer After Curative Rectal Cancer Surgery - A Case Report and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Simon Davey; Kathryn McCarthy
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Imaging Advances in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2016-04-27

8.  Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Metin Keskin; Adem Bayraktar; Emre Sivirikoz; Gülcin Yegen; Bora Karip; Esra Saglam; Mehmet Türker Bulut; Emre Balik
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.

Authors:  E J A Morris; P J Finan; K Spencer; I Geh; A Crellin; P Quirke; J D Thomas; S Lawton; R Adams; D Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Sapho Xenia Roodbeen; Marta Penna; Hugh Mackenzie; Miranda Kusters; Andrew Slater; Oliver M Jones; Ian Lindsey; Richard J Guy; Chris Cunningham; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.