BACKGROUND: Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, and pulse wave velocity of the central artery (PWV) have been widely used to evaluate progression of atherosclerosis. Our previous work has revealed that IMT, FMD and PWV are related to each other, and the combination of these measurements was useful in identifying patients with atherosclerotic disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether combination of these measurements would predict future cardiovascular events better than each test alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: From November 2000 to March 2008, 274 consecutive elderly subjects (men/women; 114/160, mean age; 71 ± 12 years) were enrolled in this study. We measured IMT, FMD, and PWV in all of these subjects and followed them for a mean of 41 ± 28 months. During the follow-up period, vascular events occurred in 42 patients (15.3%). IMT (hazard ratio = 1.28 [95%CI, 1.09-1.50], p = 0.002 per 0.1 mm increase in mean IMT) and brachial-ankle (ba) PWV (hazard ratio = 1.06 [95%CI, 1.01-1.10], p = 0.015 per 1 m/s increase in baPWV) were independent predictors of future vascular events by Cox proportional hazard analysis, although FMD did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio = 0.85 [95%CI, 0.72-1.01], p = 0.062 per 1% increase in %FMD). Importantly, the number of tests showing results in the worst tertile was a more powerful predictor (hazard ratio = 2.21 [95%CI, 1.42-3.43], p = 0.0004 for number of tests showing worst tertile) of future vascular events than either IMT, baPWV, or FMD alone. When both IMT and baPWV (with respective cut-off values of 0.98 mm and 19.1 m/s) were taken into consideration, the efficacy increased as compared with each test alone (odds ratio 4.9). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that IMT and baPWV, especially when combined, are useful in predicting future vascular events in elderly subjects.
BACKGROUND: Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, and pulse wave velocity of the central artery (PWV) have been widely used to evaluate progression of atherosclerosis. Our previous work has revealed that IMT, FMD and PWV are related to each other, and the combination of these measurements was useful in identifying patients with atherosclerotic disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether combination of these measurements would predict future cardiovascular events better than each test alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: From November 2000 to March 2008, 274 consecutive elderly subjects (men/women; 114/160, mean age; 71 ± 12 years) were enrolled in this study. We measured IMT, FMD, and PWV in all of these subjects and followed them for a mean of 41 ± 28 months. During the follow-up period, vascular events occurred in 42 patients (15.3%). IMT (hazard ratio = 1.28 [95%CI, 1.09-1.50], p = 0.002 per 0.1 mm increase in mean IMT) and brachial-ankle (ba) PWV (hazard ratio = 1.06 [95%CI, 1.01-1.10], p = 0.015 per 1 m/s increase in baPWV) were independent predictors of future vascular events by Cox proportional hazard analysis, although FMD did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio = 0.85 [95%CI, 0.72-1.01], p = 0.062 per 1% increase in %FMD). Importantly, the number of tests showing results in the worst tertile was a more powerful predictor (hazard ratio = 2.21 [95%CI, 1.42-3.43], p = 0.0004 for number of tests showing worst tertile) of future vascular events than either IMT, baPWV, or FMD alone. When both IMT and baPWV (with respective cut-off values of 0.98 mm and 19.1 m/s) were taken into consideration, the efficacy increased as compared with each test alone (odds ratio 4.9). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that IMT and baPWV, especially when combined, are useful in predicting future vascular events in elderly subjects.
Authors: Yasushi Matsuzawa; Sara Svedlund; Tatsuo Aoki; Raviteja R Guddeti; Taek-Geun Kwon; Rebecca Cilluffo; R Jay Widmer; Rebecca E Nelson; Ryan J Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Sinsia Gao; Peter Ganz; Li-Ming Gan; Amir Lerman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Paolo Melillo; Raffaele Izzo; Ada Orrico; Paolo Scala; Marcella Attanasio; Marco Mirra; Nicola De Luca; Leandro Pecchia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yamnia I Cortés; Janet M Catov; Maria Brooks; Samar R El Khoudary; Rebecca C Thurston; Karen A Matthews; Carmen R Isasi; Elizabeth A Jackson; Emma Barinas-Mitchell Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 5.162