Literature DB >> 24267166

Imaging in rectal cancer: magnetic resonance imaging versus endorectal ultrasonography.

Tushar Samdani1, Julio Garcia-Aguilar.   

Abstract

Over the past several decades there have been tremendous improvements in the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. Imaging modalities such as endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography scanning play a pivotal role in evaluating rectal cancer preoperatively, planning surgical procedures, and selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy. This article provides an overview of rectal anatomy and pelvic structures relevant to preoperative assessment and surgical treatment. The technical aspects, applications, and limitations of the imaging tools currently in use are examined, focusing on MRI and ERUS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin; Endorectal ultrasonography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal cancer; Tumor staging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24267166     DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2013.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am        ISSN: 1055-3207            Impact factor:   3.495


  13 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Yifei Chen; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Non-operative management of rectal cancer: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Iris H Wei; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Organ-Preserving Strategies for the Management of Near-Complete Responses in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Patricio B Lynn; Paul Strombom; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 4.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

5.  Colonoscopic and histologic features of rectal masses in dogs: 82 cases (1995-2012).

Authors:  Krista N Adamovich-Rippe; Philipp D Mayhew; Stanley L Marks; Laura E Selmic; William T N Culp; Angela M Youello; Jeffrey J Runge; David E Holt; Philip H Kass; John R Peauroi
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Paola De Nardi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Time-intensity curve parameters in rectal cancer measured using endorectal ultrasonography with sterile coupling gels filling the rectum: correlations with tumor angiogenesis and clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Lin Li; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Ning-Yi Cui; Shuang-Mei Zou; Chun-Wu Zhou; Yu-Xin Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and pathological complete response in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Linda Ferrari; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Adrian Cote; Florin Graur; Andrei Lebovici; Emil Mois; Nadim Al Hajjar; Codruta Mare; Radu Badea; Cornel Iancu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 10.  Transrectal ultrasonography of anorectal diseases: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Min Ju Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.