Literature DB >> 24267113

Outcomes of intracorporeal lithotripsy of upper tract stones is not affected by BMI and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) in obese and morbid patients.

Alexandre Pompeo1, Wilson R Molina, Cesar Juliano, David Sehrt, Fernando J Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if body mass index (BMI) and stone skin distance (SSD) affect stone free rate (SFR) in obese and morbid obese patients who underwent flexible URS for proximal ureteral or renal stones < 20 mm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive patients that underwent flexible URS. Inclusion criteria were: proximal ureteral stones and renal stones less than 20 mm in the preoperative computed tomography (CT). SFR were then compared according to SSD and BMI.
RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were eligible for this analysis, 49 (32.02%) with SSD < 10 cm and 104 (67.97%) with SSD ≥ 10 cm. The mean stone size was 10.5 ± 6.4 mm. The overall SFR in our study was 82.4%. The SFR for the SSD < 10 and ≥ 10 were 79.6% and 83.7% respectively (p = 0.698) and for BMI < 30, ≥ 30 and < 40 and ≥ 40 were 82.9%, 81.7% and 90.9% respectively. Regression analysis showed no affect between BMI or SSD regarding SFR.
CONCLUSION: Ureteroscopy should be considered as a first-line of treatment for renal/proximal stones in obese and morbid obese patients. URS may be preferable to SWL in obese patients independently of the SSD, BMI or the location of proximal stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24267113     DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.05.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Husain Alenezi; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23

4.  Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; XiaoShuai Gao; Liao Peng; Tao Jin
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Is scoring system of computed tomography based metric parameters can accurately predicts shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rates and aid in the development of treatment strategies?

Authors:  Yasser Ali Badran; Alsayed Saad Abdelaziz; Mohamed Ahmed Shehab; Hazem Abdelsabour Dief Mohamed; Absel-Aziz Ali Emara; Ali Mohamed Ali Elnabtity; Maged Mohammed Ghanem; Hesham Abdel Azim ELHelaly
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.