Literature DB >> 24266951

Patch esophagoplasty: esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds.

Alejandro Nieponice1, Franco F Ciotola2, Fabio Nachman2, Blair A Jobe3, Toshitaka Hoppo3, Ricardo Londono3, Stephen Badylak3, Adolfo E Badaloni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard techniques for surgical reconstruction of the esophagus remain suboptimal. Primary closure of diseased or injured esophagus has been associated with high morbidity, primarily due to leak and stricture, and synthetic materials are contraindicated due to the high risk of erosion and infection. Degradable bioscaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have recently shown promising results in both pre-clinical and clinical settings to prevent stricture after extended endoscopic mucosal resection. We propose a novel surgical technique that utilizes an ECM scaffold as a reconstructive patch to augment the esophageal diameter during primary repair.
METHODS: Four patients requiring esophageal reconstruction underwent a patch esophagoplasty using an ECM scaffold composed of porcine urinary bladder ECM. The full thickness wall of the esophagus was replaced with an ECM patch that was sutured to the edges of the remaining esophagus, similar to the patch angioplasty performed in vascular procedures.
RESULTS: All patients had a favorable clinical outcome with immediate recovery from the procedure and reinstated oral intake after 7 days. One patient had a micro leak at day 5 that closed spontaneously 2 days after drainage. Follow-up studies including barium swallow and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed adequate esophageal emptying through the surgical segment in all patients. The EGD showed complete mucosal remodeling at 2 months, with approximately 20% area contraction at the patch level. The area of the defect was indistinguishable from surrounding healthy tissue. Biopsy of the patch area showed normal squamous epithelium. One of the patients had a separate intrathoracic stricture that required further surgery. Clinical outcomes were otherwise favorable in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: An alternative for the treatment of esophageal stenosis is presented which uses a biological scaffold and an innovative surgical procedure. Additional work, including prospective studies and long-term follow-up, is required to fully evaluate the potential of this bioscaffold-based regenerative medicine approach for esophageal reconstruction.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  8

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24266951     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  33 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiang-Ping Yu; Yong-Jun Liu; Ya-Li Tao; Rong-Wei Ruan; Zhao Cui; Shu-Wen Zhu; Wang Shi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Bi-layer silk fibroin grafts support functional tissue regeneration in a porcine model of onlay esophagoplasty.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Debra Franck; Vivian Cristofaro; Xuehui Yang; Alyssa Savarino; Saif Affas; Frank-Mattias Schäfer; Chiara Ghezzi; Russell Jennings; Arthur Nedder; David L Kaplan; Maryrose P Sullivan; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 3.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Bioengineering and regeneration of gastrointestinal tissue: where are we now and what comes next?

Authors:  Elie Zakhem; Shreya Raghavan; Riley A Suhar; Khalil N Bitar
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 5.  Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development.

Authors:  Martin T Spang; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  Bioengineering the gut: future prospects of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Khalil N Bitar; Elie Zakhem
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support functional tissue regeneration in a rat model of onlay esophagoplasty.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Debra Franck; Chiara E Ghezzi; Vivian Cristofaro; Xuehui Yang; Maryrose P Sullivan; Yeun Goo Chung; Saif Affas; Russell Jennings; David L Kaplan; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Human Testis Extracellular Matrix Enhances Human Spermatogonial Stem Cell Survival In Vitro.

Authors:  Mark H Murdock; Sherin David; Ilea T Swinehart; Janet E Reing; Kien Tran; Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.845

9.   Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Madeline C Cramer; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Regenerative medicine for the esophagus.

Authors:  Kengo Kanetaka; Shinichiro Kobayashi; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.