Literature DB >> 24266947

Modified single-patch compared with two-patch repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect.

Shinya Ugaki1, Nee S Khoo1, David B Ross1, Ivan M Rebeyka1, Ian Adatia2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of modified single-patch and two-patch surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) on left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and on left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) coaptation.
METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively postoperative 2-dimensional echocardiograms of all CAVSD patients who underwent modified single-patch or two-patch repair between 2005 and 2011. We measured the leaflet coaptation length of the LAVV in the apical four-chamber view. The LVOT was measured in the long axis view.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent CAVSD repair at a median age of 4 months (range, 1 to 9 months) (single-patch, n=29; two-patch, n=22). The images from 46 echocardiograms were adequate for analysis. Modified single-patch repair required significantly shorter bypass time (102.0±33.6 vs 152.9±39.5 minutes, p<0.001) and ischemic time (69.0±21.7 vs 106.9±29.7 minutes, p<0.001) than did two-patch repair. The indexed coaptation length of the septal and lateral leaflets was not different between single-patch and two-patch (3.1±2.3 vs 4.1±3.1 mm/m2, p=0.25; 2.3±2.3 vs 3.3±3.0 mm/m2, p=0.21). Indexed LVOT diameter was not different in the two groups (26.1±5.2 vs 28.5±7.1 mm/m2, p=0.22). There was no hospital or late death during the median follow-up time of 35 months (range, 1 to 69 months). Five patients underwent reoperation after single-patch repair (3 with residual ventricular septal defect [VSD] and LAVV regurgitation, 1 with residual VSD, 1 with pacemaker implantation). After the two-patch repair, 1 patient required reoperation for a residual VSD and right atrioventricular valve regurgitation (p=0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified single-patch repair was performed with significantly shorter bypass time and myocardial ischemic time. The postoperative LVOT diameter and LAVV leaflet coaptation length were not significantly different between techniques.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24266947     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Modified Single-Patch Technique Versus Two-Patch Technique for the Repair of Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dongxu Li; Qiang Fan; Tomoyuki Iwase; Yasutaka Hirata; Qi An
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Atrioventricular Septal Defects: Pathology, Imaging, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Anas S Taqatqa; Joseph J Vettukattil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Modified Single Repair Technique for Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Guanxi Wang; Kai Ma; Kunjing Pang; Zhongdong Hua; Sen Zhang; Lei Qi; Yang Yang; Zicong Feng; Fengqun Mao; Hao Zhang; Shoujun Li
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  "Repair of common atrioventricular junction in isolation and when associated with other congenital heart defects".

Authors:  Neville Abel George Solomon; Musthafa Janeel; Swaminathan Vaidyanathan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-11

5.  Correlation of ventricular septal defect height and outcomes after complete atrioventricular septal defect repair.

Authors:  Laura S Fong; David Youssef; Julian Ayer; Ian A Nicholson; David S Winlaw; Yishay Orr
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.