Literature DB >> 24265524

Decreased renal function is an independent predictor of severity of coronary artery disease: an application of Gensini score.

Il Young Kim1, In Hye Hwang, Kyung Nam Lee, Dong Won Lee, Soo Bong Lee, Min Ji Shin, Harin Rhee, Byeongyun Yang, Sang Heon Song, Eun Young Seong, Ihm Soo Kwak.   

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Although many studies have shown a higher prevalence of CAD among these patients, the association between the spectrum of renal dysfunction and severity of CAD remains unclear. In this study, we investigate the association between renal function and the severity of CAD. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,192 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography (CAG). The severity of CAD was evaluated by Gensini score according to the degree of luminal narrowing and location(s) of obstruction in the involved main coronary artery. In all patients, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was independently associated with Gensini score (β=-0.27, P < 0.001) in addition to diabetes mellitus (β=0.07, P = 0.02), hypertension (β=0.12, P < 0.001), low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (β=0.08, P = 0.003), and hemoglobin (β=-0.07, P = 0.03) after controlling for other confounding factors. The result of this study demonstrates that decreased renal function is associated not only with the prevalence, but also the severity, of CAD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary Artery Disease; Gensini Score; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Kidney Failure, Chronic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265524      PMCID: PMC3835503          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.11.1615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been a serious health problem with poor patient outcomes and high health care costs (1). Among patients with CKD, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death, and it is well known that renal dysfunction, even mild degrees of impairment (2), is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (3, 4). This is a trend which is also observed with coronary artery disease (CAD) (5, 6). To better understand the adverse effect of impaired renal function on CAD, several studies have assessed the association between CKD and the severity of CAD. In one study by Nicholls et al. (7), total atheroma volume and percent atheroma volume did not differ between patients with and without CKD. This finding suggested that the increased incidence of cardiovascular events among patients with impaired renal function might result from causes other than atherosclerotic burden. Others (8-12) have demonstrated that impaired renal function was independently associated with angiographic severity of CAD. In these studies, the severity of CAD was stratified only by the number of stenotic coronary arteries and did not account for the importance of either the location or severity of the stenosis. Thus, it is possible that the severity of CAD was not appropriately stratified in those studies. In this study, we have evaluated the association between renal impairment and the severity of CAD. To assess the severity of CAD in a more relevant manner, Gensini score (13) was used to reflect the degree of total coronary atherosclerosis burden.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

The medical record of 1,192 patients who visited coronary angiography (CAG) center at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, from January 2009 to May 2011, were retrospectively reviewed in this cross-sectional study. Only the patients who underwent elective CAG, not emergency CAG, for the first time were included. Patients with a history of coronary revascularization, congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and maintenance dialysis treatment were excluded.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical data on age, gender, smoking habit, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension were obtained via review of electronic medical record. Blood pressure was measured in the right upper arm of patients in a sedentary position using mercury sphygmomanometer by trained technicians. Body mass index (BMI) was measured by weight and height of patient and expressed as kg/m2. All blood examination including total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting blood glucose (FBG), creatinine, albumin, uric acid, calcium, phosphate, hemoglobin and C-reactive (CRP) was measured after an overnight fast of at least 12 hr. Serum creatinine was measured by enzymatic method. DM was defined as 1) use of diabetes medication, 2) FBG of more than 126 mg/dL. Hypertension was defined as 1) use of hypertension medication, 2) systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was measured by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation (14): eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)=186×sCr-1.154 × age-0.203 × 0.742 (if female). Depending on the eGFR value, each patient was classified into one of the 4 CKD groups according to the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF KDOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines (15): Non-CKD group (n= 684), eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD stage 3 (n=421), 30 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD stage 4 (n=61), 15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD stage 5 (n=26), eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Non-CKD group was defined as eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 simply according to eGFR. CKD stage 1 and stage 2 were not considered. In this study, dialysis-dependent patients were not included in the CKD stage 5 group. To exclude acute kidney injury and identify the presence of CKD, we only included patients 1) whose previous serum creatinine level before CAG was known via medical record or 2) who were followed for at least 3 months after CAG.

Coronary angiography

All of the patients in this study underwent elective CAG, as this was the inclusion criteria. The result of CAG was analyzed by a group of three experienced cardiologists. A case of CAD was defined as significant if one or more main coronary artery had a lumen narrowing equal to greater than 50%. The severity of CAD was evaluated by the Gensini score (13). The points were assigned according to the percentage of luminal narrowing: 1 point for 1%-25% occlusion, 2 for 26%-50%, 4 for 51%-75%, 8 for 76%-90%, 16 for 91%-99%, and 32 points for a complete occlusion. Each of these points are compounded by multiplications factors accounting for the differences in the location of obstruction, such as 5 for left main artery, 2.5 for proximal left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries, and 1 for proximal right coronary artery. Finally, the total Gensini score for each patient was expressed as the sum total score of each CAD lesion.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD, while categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Differences among groups were tested with one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and with chi-square test for categorical variables. The differences in Gensini score were further analyzed by Games-Howell type multiple comparisons. The association between various variables and the presence of significant CAD was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The association between variables and Gensini score was analyzed by Pearson's correlation and multivariate linear regression model. All associations of P < 0.10 from univariate analyses were entered into multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS 17.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (IRB No. 05-2013-023). Informed consent was waived by the board.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. Of the 1,192 total, 684 patients (57.4%) were in Non-CKD group, 421 (35.3%) in CKD stage 3, 61 (5.1%) in CKD stage 4, and 26 (2.2%) in CKD stage 5. Mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) was 80.7 ± 11.0 for the Non-CKD group, 47.6 ± 8.6 in CKD stage 3, 25.4 ± 3.5 in CKD stage 4, and 7.6 ± 2.7 in CKD stage 5 group. Age, male gender, and smoking status were similar across the 4 groups. Prevalence of DM and hypertension; levels of serum albumin, uric acid, calcium, phosphate, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol (P = 0.03), CRP, and hemoglobin; and BMI were significantly different across the groups (P < 0.001, except as otherwise noted for LDL cholesterol). Prevalence of significant CAD was significantly different: 44.9% in Non-CKD, 65.8% in CKD stage 3, 77.0% in CKD stage 4, and 88.5% in CKD stage 5 (P < 0.001). The Gensini score showed a positive correlation to increasing stages of CKD in all patients (n=1,192), patients with DM (n=456), patients with hypertension (n=441), and patients without DM and hypertension (n=526) (Fig. 1). In all patients (Fig. 1A) and patients without DM and hypertension (Fig. 1D), Gensini score was the highest among the patients in CKD stage 5 group, and the differences in Gensini scores were significant in Non-CKD vs CKD stage 3, CKD stage 3 vs CKD stage 4, and in CKD stage 4 vs CKD stage 5 (P < 0.05). In patients with DM (Fig. 1B) and Hypertension (Fig. 1C), Gensini score showed significant differences in Non-CKD vs CKD stage 3 and CKD stage 4 vs CKD stage 5 except CKD stage 3 vs CKD stage 4.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study population by CKD stage

Data are presented as mean ± SD, or number (%). *CKD stage groups were categorized as Non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), CKD stage 3 (30 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), CKD stage 4 (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and CKD stage 5 (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2); †Significant CAD was defined as a stenosis of 50% or greater in at least one of the main coronary arteries; ‡P represents difference across the CKD group; §P < 0.05 vs Non-CKD; ∥P < 0.05 vs CKD stage 3; ¶P < 0.05 vs CKD stage 4. BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Fig. 1

Comparison of Gensini score across the CKD groups in all patients (n = 1,192) (A), patients with DM (n = 456) (B), patients with hypertension (n = 441) (C), and patients without DM and hypertension (n = 526) (D) by ANOVA. *p < 0.05 vs non-CKD; †p < 0.05 vs CKD stage 3; ‡p < 0.05 vs CKD stage 4 by Games-Howell type multiple comparison.

Table 2 and Table 3 show which variables were associated with the presence of significant CAD. In univariate logistic regression analysis (Table 2), age, male gender, DM, hypertension, CKD stage, uric acid, calcium, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, CRP, and hemoglobin were associated with the presence of significant CAD. In multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 3), age, DM, hypertension, and LDL cholesterol, and CKD stage was independently associated with the presence of significant CAD. Patients from CKD stage 3, CKD stage 4, and CKD stage 5 groups were 1.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 - 2.40, P < 0.001), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.26-4.83, P = 0.008), and 5.07 (95% CI, 1.42-18.15, P = 0.01) times more likely to have significant CAD compared with those patients from the non-CKD group.
Table 2

Univariate logistic regression analysis for variables associated with the presence of significant coronary artery disease*

*Significant CAD was defined as a stenosis of 50% or greater in at least one of the main coronary arteries. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Table 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables associated with the presence of significant coronary artery disease*

*Significant CAD was defined as a stenosis of 50% or greater in at least one of the main coronary arteries. Other variables which did not show statistical significance were not in table, including gender, uric acid, calcium, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, CRP, and hemoglobin. CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Table 4 and Table 5 present the association of variables with Gensini score in all patients. In univariate analysis (Table 4), age, DM, hypertension, eGFR, uric acid, calcium, phosphate, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, CRP, and hemoglobin correlated with Gensini score. In multivariate linear regression analysis (Table 5), eGFR was independently associated with Gensini score (β=-0.27, P < 0.001), in addition to DM (β=0.07, P = 0.02), hypertension (β=0.12, P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (β=0.08, P < 0.003), and hemoglobin (β=-0.07, P = 0.03).
Table 4

Correlation analysis for variables associated with Gensini score

*r means Pearson's correlation coefficients. BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Table 5

Multiple linear regression analysis for variables associated with Gensini score

*β means standardized regression coefficients. Other variables which did not show statistical significance were not included in this table, including age, gender, smoking, uric acid, calcium, phosphate, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and CRP. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

DISCUSSION

The current study demonstrates an association between renal dysfunction and the severity of CAD. First, a patient's CKD stage was an independent predictor for the presence of a significant CAD after controlling for confounding factors, including traditional CVD risk factors. Patients with respective CKD stages of 3, 4, and 5 were 1.80, 2.47, and 5.07 times more likely to have significant CAD when compared to those patients who did not have chronic kidney disease. Second, eGFR was independently associated with severity of CAD quantified by Gensini score after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors. The associations between kidney function and CAD in this study are consistent with the findings from several previous studies. Davoodi et al. (8) recently showed that patients with reduced kidney function be at a 1.1 - (at 60 ≤ GFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) to 1.8 (at 15 < GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2) - fold risk of significant CAD (at least one major coronary artery with luminal narrowing ≥ 50%) than subjects with a normal renal function. Yagi et al. (9) demonstrated that CKD (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with a 2.9 - fold risk of having multivessel coronary artery disease (two or three of major coronary artery with luminal narrowing ≥ 75%). Khalique et al. (10) found that patients with decreased GFR (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were 4.1 times more likely to develop 3-vessel CAD (3 major coronary arteries with luminal narrowing ≥ 50%) than those who had normal GFR. Chonchol et al. (11) showed that patients with CKD (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) had a 3.2 - fold higher risk of having significant CAD (at least one major coronary artery with luminal narrowing ≥ 70%). Reis et al. (12) reported that mild renal insufficiency (serum creatinine 1.2-1.9 mg/dL) was associated with 1.9 times the risk of presence of significant angiographic CAD (at least one major coronary artery with luminal narrowing ≥ 50%) in women. All of the studies above (8-12) have examined the relationship between CKD and CAD using the presence/absence of significant CAD (at least 1 stenotic coronary artery with ≥ 50%- 75% reduction in diameter) or by the number of significantly obstructed coronary artery. All of these studies share the limitation arising from ignoring the importance of coronary artery anatomy. The Gensini score system (13) used in this study is a method that attempts to quantify the overall coronary atherosclerosis burden using a severity score influenced by the degree of luminal narrowing and by the location(s) of CAD. Gensini score is preferable to other scoring system because it takes into consideration not only the product of number of lesions with their respective degrees of stenosis, but also the functional significance of lesions in terms of the area of myocardium at stake (13, 16, 17). Coskun et al. (18) showed eGFR to be associated with higher SYNTAX score (19), the latter of which is another scoring system developed to approximate the CAD burden by the number of lesions, complexity of each CAD lesion, and the functional impact. Whereas Gensini score stratifies each CAD lesion into six groups (stenoses ≤ 25%, ≤ 50%, ≤ 75%, ≤ 90%, 99%, or 100%), SYNTAX score treats each CAD lesion mostly in a trimodal distribution as in stenosis ≤ 50%, >50%, or complete occlusion. In addition to the less-than-ideal stratification of SYNTAX score, the study was limited to patients with left main coronary artery and/or 3-vessel involvement and cannot be generalized to the overall CKD population. Yan et al. (20) also demonstrated that the eGFR was independently associated with the SYNTAX score. However, their study was limited by the less-than-ideal stratification of SYNTAX score and the association between SYNTAX score and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was not examined. Abaci et al. (21) did use the Gensini score system to study the relationship between CKD and CAD, and found GFR to be an independent predictor of the severity of CAD (r=0.35, P < 0.001). However, the subjects in that study were limited to patients with DM and, again, could not be generalized to all CKD patients. Cay et al. (22) also showed the independent association between GFR and Gensini score. Nevertheless, their study was limited by the small sample size. They only included 43 patients with decreased renal function and 49 patients without impaired renal function. Finally, Duran et al. (23) reported that the eGFR was an independent risk factor for SYNTAX and Gensini scores. However, their study did not include patients with CKD stage 4 and 5. How impaired renal function is closely associated with CAD remains unclear. Although this relationship could be explained by the higher prevalence of traditional CVD risk factors among CKD patients, non-traditional risk factors associated with uremia, secondary to progressive deterioration of renal function, have been proposed as a possible mechanism. These explanations include oxidative stress, inflammation, elevated calcium-phosphate product, secondary hyperparathyroidism, anemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, and neurohormonal factors such as activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and the sympathetic nervous system (24-27). Thus, the association between renal function and the severity of CAD might reflect a clinical phenotype for the recent idea embodied by the term "cardiorenal syndrome" (28). Our own study has several limitations. First, selection bias could not be avoided as with all studies of retrospective nature. This study enrolled patients who underwent elective CAG because of chest pain or discomfort and did not include those who underwent emergency CAG or asymptomatic patients with CAD. In clinical practice, attending cardiologists tend to refrain from CAG in patients with decreased renal function due to the risk of contrast induced nephropathy, and therefore, the patients in this study may not represent the overall CKD population. Thus, it is unclear if the results of this study can be extrapolated to every patient with CKD. Second, the assessment of CAG was limited to visual interpretation and might present inter- and intraobserver variability. Third, this study did not include assessment about medication history, which might affect the degree of CAD severity. In conclusion, this present study reveals eGFR is independently associated with the severity of CAD, quantified by Gensini score, even after controlling traditional CVD risk factors. When compared with similar studies, the result of this study is unique in quantifying the overall atherosclerosis burden by the use of Gensini score in the CKD population. Although an independent association between renal function and the severity of CAD was demonstrated in this study, whether Gensini score has a prognostic power to predict adverse clinical outcomes, such as CAD related mortality, in patients with impaired renal function was not known. Further large-scale prospective study is needed in order to evaluate Gensini score as a predictor CAD-related mortality in the CKD population.
  28 in total

1.  K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Relation of moderate or severe reduction in glomerular filtration rate to number of coronary arteries narrowed >50% in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Omar Khalique; Wilbert S Aronow; Chul Ahn; Michael Mazar; Barry Schair; John Shao; Venu Channamsetty
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Glomerular filtration rate is associated with burden of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Mustafa Duran; Onur Kadir Uysal; Ozgur Gunebakmaz; Oguzhan Baran; Murat Turfan; Ender Ornek; Mustafa Cetin; Sani Namik Murat; Mikail Yarlioglues; Muhammed Karadeniz; Alpaslan Kurtul; Mehmet Gungor Kaya
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Impact of chronic kidney disease on the severity of initially diagnosed coronary artery disease and the patient prognosis in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Hidenori Yagi; Makoto Kawai; Kimiaki Komukai; Takayuki Ogawa; Kosuke Minai; Tomohisa Nagoshi; Kazuo Ogawa; Hiroshi Sekiyama; Ikuo Taniguchi; Michihiro Yoshimura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Cardiorenal risk as a new frontier of nephrology: research needs and areas for intervention.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic volume in patients with glomerular filtration rates < or = 60 versus > 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2): a meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound studies.

Authors:  Stephen J Nicholls; E Murat Tuzcu; Amy Hsu; Kathy Wolski; Ilke Sipahi; Paul Schoenhagen; Timothy Crowe; Samir R Kapadia; Stanley L Hazen; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: The Hoorn Study.

Authors:  Ronald M A Henry; Piet J Kostense; Griët Bos; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Robert J Heine; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Do associations with C-reactive protein and extent of coronary artery disease account for the increased cardiovascular risk of renal insufficiency?

Authors:  James S Zebrack; Jeffrey L Anderson; Srinivasan Beddhu; Benjamin D Horne; Tami L Bair; Alfred Cheung; Joseph B Muhlestein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  The burden of kidney disease: improving global outcomes.

Authors:  Garabed Eknoyan; Norbert Lameire; Rashad Barsoum; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Adeera Levin; Nathan Levin; Francesco Locatelli; Alison MacLeod; Raymond Vanholder; Rowan Walker; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of renal function, estimated by four equations, with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yusuf C Doganer; James E Rohrer; Umit Aydogan; Cem Barcin; Tuncer Cayci; Kenan Saglam
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Analysis of the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in Different States of Renal Function.

Authors:  L-H Hu; L-J Zhang; Z-T Jin; W Yang; L-N Zhang; C-Y Lu
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 0.171

3.  Mild renal insufficiency and attributable risk of adverse In-hospital outcomes in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome from the improving care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project.

Authors:  Fengbo Xu; Guoqin Wang; Nan Ye; Weijing Bian; Lijiao Yang; Changsheng Ma; Dong Zhao; Jing Liu; Yongchen Hao; Jun Liu; Na Yang; Hong Cheng
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Influence of chronic kidney disease on the outcome of patients with chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Qing-Bin Zhang; Li-Ming Chen; Min Li; Yu-Qi Cui; Chuan-Yan Zhao; Lian-Qun Cui
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Effect of renal insufficiency on stone recurrence in patients with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Sung Phil Seo; Won Tae Kim; Yong-June Kim; Seok-Joong Yun; Sang-Cheol Lee; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Association of Serum Prealbumin with Angiographic Severity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Chenglong Zhang; Pei Liu; Ke Xia; Han Fang; Minna Jiang; Qiying Xie; Zaixin Yu; Tianlun Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-08-21

7.  Association between the level of CD4+ T lymphocyte microRNA-155 and coronary artery disease in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Zi-Liang Ye; Hai-Li Lu; Qiang Su; Lang Li
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis Prevalence and Correlations in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Data From Nonrandomized Single-Center Study (REN-ACS)—A Single Center, Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Alexandru Burlacu; Dimitrie Siriopol; Luminita Voroneanu; Ionut Nistor; Simona Hogas; Ana Nicolae; Igor Nedelciuc; Grigore Tinica; Adrian Covic
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.