Literature DB >> 24264894

Responses by corn snakes (Elaphe guttata) to chemicals from heterospecific snakes.

P J Weldon1, N B Ford, J J Perry-Richardson.   

Abstract

Young corn snakes,Elaphe guttata, were tested for responses to chemicals from heterospecific snakes. Corn snakes exhibited more tongue-flicks to swabs freshly rubbed against the skin of an ophiophagous kingsnake,Lampropeltis getulus, than to blank swabs. Responses toL. getulus and a nonophiophagous western plains garter snake,Thamnophis radix haydeni, did not differ significantly. Corn snakes exhibited more tongue-flicks to swabs treated with chloroform extracts of the shed skins ofL. getulus; an ophiophagous eastern coachwhip,Masticophis flagellum; and a nonophiophagous gray ratsnake,Elaphe obsoleta, than to blank swabs, but they did not discriminate between ophiophagous and nonophiophagous species in every case. Corn snakes, when offered shelters containing bedding from the home cages of a nonophiophagous water snake,Nerodia erythrogaster, an occasionally ophiophagous water moccasin,Agkistrodon pisdvorus; orL. getulus and untreated bedding, failed to reside under snake-scented shelters at a rate significantly different from that expected by chance. The responses of corn snakes are compared with those reported for other snakes presented with heterospecific snake chemicals.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24264894     DOI: 10.1007/BF01021266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  2 in total

1.  Following of conspecific and avoidance of predator chemical cues by pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus).

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Responses by king snakes (Lampropeltis getulus) to chemicals from colubrid and crotaline snakes.

Authors:  P J Weldon; F M Schell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.626

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.