Literature DB >> 24264787

Management of complex colonic polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

T J W Lee1, C J Rees, C Nickerson, J Stebbing, J F Abercrombie, R J Q McNally, M D Rutter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large sessile or flat colonic polyps, defined as polyps at least 20  mm in size, are difficult to treat endoscopically and may harbour malignancy. The aim of this study was to describe their current management to provide insight into optimal management.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study identified patients with large sessile or flat polyps detected in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme between 2006 and 2009. Initial therapeutic modality (surgical or endoscopic), subsequent management and outcomes were recorded. The main outcome measures analysed were: presence of malignancy, need for surgical treatment, complications, and residual or recurrent polyp at 12 months.
RESULTS: In total, 557 large sessile or flat polyps with benign appearance or initial histology were identified in 557 patients. Some 436 (78.3 per cent) were initially managed endoscopically and 121 (21.7 per cent) were managed surgically from the outset. Seventy of those initially treated endoscopically subsequently required surgery owing to the presence of malignancy (19) or not being suitable for further endoscopic management (51). Residual or recurrent polyp was present at 12 months in 26 (6.0 per cent) of 436 patients managed endoscopically. There was wide variation between centres in the use of surgery as a primary therapy, ranging from 7 to 36 per cent. Endoscopic complications included bleeding in 13 patients (3.0 per cent) and perforation in two (0.5 per cent).
CONCLUSION: Management of large sessile or flat colonic polyps is safe and effective in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Wide variation in the use of surgery suggests a need for standardized management algorithms. Presented to a meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Birmingham, U.K., March 2011.
© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24264787     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

1.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  National survey to determine current practices, training and attitudes towards advanced polypectomy in the UK.

Authors:  Joe Geraghty; Paul O'Toole; John Anderson; Roland Valori; Sanchoy Sarkar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-03

Review 3.  Polypectomy and advanced endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Kesavan Kandiah; Sharmila Subramaniam; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; William A Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick M Lynch; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian R Weston; Mala Pande; Robert S Bresalier; Asif Rashid; Lopa Mishra; Marta L Davila; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Effect of time of day and daily endoscopic workload on outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps.

Authors:  Yonatan J Hillman; Bari S Hillman; Divyesh V Sejpal; Calvin Lee; Larry S Miller; Petros C Benias; Arvind J Trindade
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Kyle H Sheetz; Ana C De Roo; Tadd Hiatt; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Multicentre study of surgical referral and outcomes of patients with benign colorectal lesions.

Authors:  N C A Vermeer; M P M de Neree Tot Babberich; P Fockens; I D Nagtegaal; C J H van de Velde; E Dekker; P J Tanis; K C M J Peeters
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 8.  Recent advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Shelley Nair; Iosif Beintaris; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-11

Review 9.  Large Colorectal Lesions: Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Dos Santos; Júlio Carlos Pereira-Lima; Fernanda de Quadros Onófrio
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-23

10.  Quality of endoscopy reporting at index colonoscopy significantly impacts outcome of subsequent EMR in patients with > 20 mm colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala Raju; Phillip Lum; William Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick Lynch; Jeffrey Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian Weston; Boris Blechacz; George J Chang; Katherine Hagan; Asif Rashid; Marta Davila; John Stroehlein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.