Literature DB >> 24263966

Stromal signatures in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas.

Iñigo Espinosa1, Lluis Catasus1, Emanuela D' Angelo1, Ana Mozos1, Nuria Pedrola1, Cristina Bértolo1, Irene Ferrer1, Gian Franco Zannoni2, Robert B West3, Matt van de Rijn3, Xavier Matias-Guiu4, Jaime Prat1.   

Abstract

The pattern of myometrial invasion in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas varies considerably; ie, from widely scattered glands and cell nests, often associated with a fibromyxoid stromal reaction (desmoplasia) and/or a lymphocytic infiltrate, to invasive glands with little or no stromal response. Recently, two distinct stromal signatures derived from a macrophage response (colony-stimulating factor 1, CSF1) and a fibroblastic response (desmoid-type fibromatosis, DTF) were identified in breast carcinomas and correlated with clinicopathologic features including outcome. In this study, we explored whether these stromal signatures also apply to endometrioid carcinomas and how their expression patterns correlated with morphologic changes. We studied the stromal signatures both by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in 98 primary endometrioid carcinomas with (87 cases) and without (11 cases) myometrial invasion as well as in the corresponding regional lymph nodes metatases of 9 myoinvasive tumors. Desmoplasia correlated positively with the DTF expression signature. Likewise, mononuclear infiltrates were found in the stroma of tumors expressing CSF1. Twenty-four out of eighty-seven (27%) myoinvasive endometrioid carcinomas were positive for the macrophage signature and thirteen out of eighty-seven (15%) expressed the fibroblast signature. Eleven additional cases were positive for both DTF and CSF1 signatures (11/87; 13%). However, over half of the cases (39/87; 45%) and the majority of the non-myoinvasive tumors (8/11; 73%) failed to express any of the two stromal signatures. The macrophage response (CSF1) was associated with higher tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and PIK3CA mutations (P<0.05). There was a concordance in the expression of the CSF1 signature in the primary tumors and their corresponding lymph node metastases. This study is the first characterization of stromal signatures in endometrioid carcinomas. Our findings shed new light on the relationship between genetically different endometrioid carcinomas and various stromal responses. Preservation of the CSF1 macrophage stromal response in the metastases leds support to targeting the CSF1 pathway in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24263966     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  13 in total

1.  Upregulation of CSF-1 is correlated with elevated TAM infiltration and poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Guo; Jia-Yi Zhang; Xin-Zhan Shi; Qiong Wang; Wei-Li Shen; Wei-Wen Zhu; Lai-Kui Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  β-Klotho inhibits CSF-1 secretion and delays the development of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Fu Hua; Xiaogang Chen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.173

3.  microRNA-26a suppresses recruitment of macrophages by down-regulating macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression through the PI3K/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zong-Tao Chai; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Jian-Yang Ao; Wen-Quan Wang; Dong-Mei Gao; Jian Kong; Ning Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Bo-Gen Ye; De-Ning Ma; Hao Cai; Hui-Chuan Sun
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 4.  Functional Relationship between Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor as Contributors to Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Damya Laoui; Eva Van Overmeire; Patrick De Baetselier; Jo A Van Ginderachter; Geert Raes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Tissue and imaging biomarkers for hypoxia predict poor outcome in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Anna Berg; Kristine E Fasmer; Karen K Mauland; Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Erling A Hoivik; Jenny A Husby; Ingvild L Tangen; Jone Trovik; Mari K Halle; Kathrine Woie; Line Bjørge; Atle Bjørnerud; Helga B Salvesen; Henrica M J Werner; Camilla Krakstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Self-renewal and phenotypic conversion are the main physiological responses of macrophages to the endogenous estrogen surge.

Authors:  Giovanna Pepe; Daniele Braga; Tiziana A Renzi; Alessandro Villa; Chiara Bolego; Francesca D'Avila; Cristina Barlassina; Adriana Maggi; Massimo Locati; Elisabetta Vegeto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Overview on Clinical Relevance of Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Giorgio Stanta; Serena Bonin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-06

8.  Colony‑stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition blocks macrophage infiltration and endometrial cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Fu Hua; Ye Tian; Yingchun Gao; Changhua Li; Xiaoping Liu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.952

9.  The prognostic significance of tumour-stroma ratio in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hannah Panayiotou; Nicolas M Orsi; Helene H Thygesen; Alexander I Wright; Matthew Winder; Richard Hutson; Michele Cummings
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  The Emerging Role of the Microenvironment in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Subhransu S Sahoo; Xu Dong Zhang; Hubert Hondermarck; Pradeep S Tanwar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.