Literature DB >> 24263916

Genetic manipulation in plant breeding: somatic versus generative.

J Sybenga1.   

Abstract

A comparison is made between molecular/ in vitro/somatic and plant-level/generative approaches in the reconstruction of genotypes and reproductive systems. Although classical methods will remain the basis of plant breeding, a number of new somatic as well as generative genetic manipulation techniques are definitely applicable in several special situations. The first are technically more demanding, the latter are often conceptually more difficult, and both are laborious. Choice of approach is determined by the plant species, the stage of development of the techniques, the amount of background genetic information and the genetic diversity available, and the capacity of the institution involved. In the final stages of the program traditional selection and testing procedures remain indispensable. Whether any particular breeding program will profit from the incorporation of sophisticated genetic manipulation techniques must be carefully analysed. This discussion is intended to provide a basis for this analysis.

Year:  1983        PMID: 24263916     DOI: 10.1007/BF00251141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  24 in total

1.  Mitotic Nondisjunction in the Case of Interchanges Involving the B-Type Chromosome in Maize.

Authors:  H Roman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1947-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic transfer in plants through interspecific protoplast fusion.

Authors:  J F Shepard; D Bidney; T Barsby; R Kemble
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Arrangement and association of somatic chromosomes induced by chloramphenicol in barley.

Authors:  H Yoshida; H Yamaguchi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Genetic control of recombination in Schizophyllum commune: specific and independent regulation of adjacent and non-adjacent chromosomal regions.

Authors:  G Simchen; J Stamberg
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Double minutes and homogeneously staining regions: gene amplification in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J K Cowell
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes.

Authors:  R D Palmiter; R L Brinster; R E Hammer; M E Trumbauer; M G Rosenfeld; N C Birnberg; R M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Isolation and culture of cereal protoplasts : Part 2: Embryogenesis and plantlet formation from protoplasts of Pennisetum americanum.

Authors:  V Vasil; I K Vasil
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Potato protoplasts in crop improvement.

Authors:  J F Shepard; D Bidney; E Shahin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Contributions of conventional plant breeding to food production.

Authors:  N E Borlaug
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Multiple chromosomal interchanges in pearl millet.

Authors:  D S Brar; J L Minocha
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  1 in total

1.  Callus formation from protoplasts of a sugarbeet cell suspension culture.

Authors:  L Szabados; C Gaggero
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.