Literature DB >> 24263900

Discussing preferred place of death with patients: staff experiences in a UK specialist palliative care setting.

Anna Fields1, Anne M Finucane, David Oxenham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National end-of-life care policies propose that health professionals regularly discuss matters such as preferred place of death (PPD) with patients. AIM: To explore clinician experiences of discussing PPD with palliative care patients.
METHOD: Six clinicians from a Scottish hospice each participated in a semi-structured interview. Interview data was analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
RESULTS: Four themes were integral to the participants' accounts: the importance of discussing preferences at the end of life (staff recognise the value of discussing patients' final wishes), identifying how and when to discuss PPD (discussions are tailored to the individual), reflecting on the emotional aspects of discussing PPD (discussing PPD is challenging but rewarding), and a journey from expectations to experience (discussing PPD becomes easier with time).
CONCLUSION: Although potentially difficult, the participants believed that advance care planning is important and beneficial. With time, they had developed communication strategies enabling them to discuss PPD in an effective, patient-centred way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24263900     DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.11.558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs        ISSN: 1357-6321


  1 in total

1.  Factors influencing practitioner adoption of carer-led assessment in palliative homecare: A qualitative study of the use of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT).

Authors:  Lynn Austin; Gail Ewing; Gunn Grande
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.