Duran Efe1, Fatih Aygün2. 1. Mevlana University, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Radiologia, Konya, Turquia. 2. Mevlana University, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Konya, Turquia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some risk factors for atherosclerosis are followed by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We wanted to use Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as technique for searching relationship between NAFLD and coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVE: The relationship between NAFLD and CAD was investigated using MSCT. METHODS: A total of 372 individuals with or without cardiac symptoms who had undergone MSCT angiography were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of NAFLD. Coronary artery segments were visually evaluated via MSCT angiography. Based on the coronary artery stenosis degree, those with no or minimal plaques were considered normal, whereas those who had stenosis of less than 50% and at least one plaque were considered to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease (non-obsCAD). The patients who had at least one plaque and coronary artery stenosis of 50% or more were considered to have obstructive coronary artery disease (obsCAD). NAFLD was determined according to the MSCT protocol, using the liver density. RESULTS: According to the liver density, the number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (group 1) was 204 (149 males, 54.8%) and with normal liver (group 2) was 168 (95 males, 45.2%). There were 50 (24.5%) non-obsCAD and 57 (27.9%) obsCAD cases in Group 1, and 39 (23.2%) non-obsCAD and 23 (13.7%) obsCAD cases in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The present study using MSCT demonstrated that the frequency of coronary artery disease in patients with NAFDL was significantly higher than that of patients without NAFDL.
BACKGROUND: Some risk factors for atherosclerosis are followed by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We wanted to use Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as technique for searching relationship between NAFLD and coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVE: The relationship between NAFLD and CAD was investigated using MSCT. METHODS: A total of 372 individuals with or without cardiac symptoms who had undergone MSCT angiography were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of NAFLD. Coronary artery segments were visually evaluated via MSCT angiography. Based on the coronary artery stenosis degree, those with no or minimal plaques were considered normal, whereas those who had stenosis of less than 50% and at least one plaque were considered to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease (non-obsCAD). The patients who had at least one plaque and coronary artery stenosis of 50% or more were considered to have obstructive coronary artery disease (obsCAD). NAFLD was determined according to the MSCT protocol, using the liver density. RESULTS: According to the liver density, the number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (group 1) was 204 (149 males, 54.8%) and with normal liver (group 2) was 168 (95 males, 45.2%). There were 50 (24.5%) non-obsCAD and 57 (27.9%) obsCAD cases in Group 1, and 39 (23.2%) non-obsCAD and 23 (13.7%) obsCAD cases in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The present study using MSCT demonstrated that the frequency of coronary artery disease in patients with NAFDL was significantly higher than that of patients without NAFDL.
Today, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered as the most common
chronic liver disease in Western populations[1,2]. Since the cases are
generally asymptomatic, the true prevalence of NAFLD is unknown. Hepatic enzymes are
within normal ranges in 70% of the patients. Adult screening studies found the
prevalence of NAFLD to be 10%-15% in normal-weight individuals, but 70%-80% in obesepeople[3,4]. NAFLD comprises a wide spectrum of hepatic damage
ranging from simple steatosis and steatohepatitis to advanced fibrosis and
cirrhosis[3]. Risk factors for
atherosclerosis including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome,
dyslipidemia and insulin resistance, accompany NAFLD[5-8].Computed tomography (CT) is the right modality for detecting fatty liver
disease[9]. The attenuation value
differences between liver and spleen are used for hepatosteatosis diagnosis. The mean
liver attenuation value minus the mean spleen attenuation value presenting a difference
of ≤ 10 Hounsfield Units indicates hepatosteatosis[9,10].Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography is considered a non-invasive
modality for the detection and classification of coronary artery disease (CAD)[11,12].The present study investigated the relation between CAD and non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease using MSCT angiography protocol.
Methods
Patients' Clinical Characteristics
The present study comprises 372 patients with or without cardiac symptoms, who
underwent MSCT angiography in our clinic between January 2008 and September 2012.
Data were collected retrospectively and the ethical committee approval was
obtained.Study groups included individuals who did not consume alcohol or had an alcohol
consumption of less than 20 g/day ethanol. People with positive serology for
hepatitis B or C or who had a history of chronic liver disease were excluded from the
study.Dyslipidemia was defined as a fasting serum triglyceride level ≥ 150 mg/dl,
low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level ≥ 140 mg/dl, and/or high-density
lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level < 40 mg/dl, and those receiving or not active
medical treatment for this[13].Before CT scan, the height (Human weighing machine, NAN TARTI AŞ, Turkey) and body
weight (TANITA Body Composition Analyzer, TANITA Corporation, Japan) of the
participants were measured, and their body mass indexes (BMI) were calculated. Those
with a BMI lower than 25 kilogram (kg)/square meter (m2) (BMI<25
kg/m2) were considered normal-weight, those with a BMI between 25 and
30 kg/m2 (25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2) were
considered over-weight, and those with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (30
kg/m2 ≤ BMI) were considered obese.
MSCT Image Reconstruction and CAD evaluation
MSCT angiography was performed via tomography device Somatom Sensation 64 (Siemens,
Forchheim, Germany). The acquisition parameters were a gantry rotation time of 330
milliseconds, tube voltage of 120 kilowatt, 250 milliamps (mAs), and detector
collimation of 0.6 millimeter. Scans were obtained within a breath-hold in
approximately 8.4-13.1 seconds in the craniocaudal direction from the level of the
carina to the subcostal level. During MSCT angiography scanning, 80-to-110
milliliters (ml) of non-ionic contrast agent (Iomeron 400, Bracco s.p.a., Milan,
Italy), depending on the patient's body weight, was given through an antecubital vein
at a rate of 5.0 milliliter (ml)/second (s) followed by a bolus administration of 40
ml of normal saline. Automatic peak contrast intensity in the ascending aorta was
determined to be +140 Hounsfield units. The images were reconstructed using a
retrospective electrocardiographic gating technique (with a slice thickness of 0.6 mm
and a reconstruction index of 0.6 mm). Multiplanar and three-dimensional volume
rendering images were created from thin axial sections, and coronary artery anatomy
was studied.All coronary artery segments were visually examined. Among the study participants,
those with no or minimal plaques were considered normal (Figure 1), those with stenosis less than 50% and which had at
least one plaque were considered to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease
(non-obsCAD) (Figures 2a and 2b), and those with at least one plaque and
coronary artery stenosis ≥50% were considered to have obstructive coronary artery
disease (Figures 3a and 3b). MSCT coronary angiography examinations were performed by
radiologists, cardiovascular surgeons and cardiologists.
Figure 1
3-D reconstruction image are showing normal coronary arteries (RCA: right
coronary artery; Cx: circumflex coronary artery; LAD: left anterior descending
artery).
Figure 2
A) Multiplanar reconstruction image is showing mild stenotic calcified coronary
plaques at proximal area of RCA(arrows) (RCA: right coronary artery). B) 3-D
reconstruction image are showing mild stenotic calcified coronary plaques at
proximal area of RCA(arrows) (RCA: right coronary artery)
Figure 3
A) Multiplanar reconstruction image is showing total vessel occlusion of the
right coronary artery due to diffuse soft plaque (arrows). B) 3-D
reconstruction image is showing considerable atherosclerosis with diffuse
calcifications of LAD and Cx (arrows)(LAD: the left anterior descending artery;
Cx: circumflex coronary artery)
3-D reconstruction image are showing normal coronary arteries (RCA: right
coronary artery; Cx: circumflex coronary artery; LAD: left anterior descending
artery).A) Multiplanar reconstruction image is showing mild stenotic calcified coronary
plaques at proximal area of RCA(arrows) (RCA: right coronary artery). B) 3-D
reconstruction image are showing mild stenotic calcified coronary plaques at
proximal area of RCA(arrows) (RCA: right coronary artery)A) Multiplanar reconstruction image is showing total vessel occlusion of the
right coronary artery due to diffuse soft plaque (arrows). B) 3-D
reconstruction image is showing considerable atherosclerosis with diffuse
calcifications of LAD and Cx (arrows)(LAD: the left anterior descending artery;
Cx: circumflex coronary artery)
Assessment of NAFLD
Most individuals with NAFLD have no symptoms and signs of liver disease. Hepatomegaly
may be the unique physical finding. The most common laboratory abnormality is
mild-to-moderate elevation in serum hepatic enzyme levels. The diagnosis of NAFLD is
made based on proven fatty infiltration in the liver of the individuals without
chronic liver disease (primary or secondary) and without alcohol consumption.
Although abdominal ultrasonography is the most commonly used modality, the present
study used the non-contrasted images of the liver obtained by MSCT angiography
scanning protocol.The individuals, whose non-contrast CT scans in the MSCT angiography protocol
involved the level between the carina and subcostal plane, were included in the
study. Densities of the liver and spleen were measured (Figure 4). Individuals with hepatic density lesser than spleen
density by 10 HU or higher were named as Group 1. The other study participants
without hepatosteatosis were considered to have normal livers and they were named as
Group 2. Hepatic and splenic density measurement was done by drawing circular region
of interests (ROIs) on three axial slices, and the mean values were recorded.
Vascular and biliary structures were avoided while drawing the ROIs (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Diffuse fat deposition in the liver (non-contrast CT section). Liver density is
37 HU and spleen density is 68 HU.
Diffuse fat deposition in the liver (non-contrast CT section). Liver density is
37 HU and spleen density is 68 HU.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software version (SPSS Inc., Chicago,
IL, USA). The comparison of nonparametric data between the groups was performed with
the Pearson's Chi-square analysis. Parametric data were presented as minimum,
maximum, and mean ± standard deviation. The comparison of parametric data between the
groups was performed with the independent student t-test. Results were considered
statistically significant if the two-tailed p value was lower than 0.01 (p < 0.01)
(Table 1). Different characteristics
between the groups including age, gender, dyslipidemia, smoking were subjected to
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis. Results were considered statistically
significant if the two-tailed p value was lower than 0.01 (p < 0.01) (Table 2).
Table 1
Data and statistical results about groups
Group 1 (n = 204)
Group 2 (n = 168)
p value
Age (±SD)
50,8 ± 10,9
48,09 ± 11,5
0,018¥
Gender (male)
149 (% 73)
95 (% 56,5)
0,001§
Hepatic density (HU)
43,7 ± 9
62,2 ± 5,2
0¥
Diabetes
Nondiabetic
130 (% 63,7)
124 (% 73,8)
0,112§
Oral a/d
54 (% 26,5)
33 (% 19,8)
Parenteral a/d
20 (% 9,4)
11 (% 6,5)
Dyslipidemia
161 (% 78,9)
108 (% 64,3)
0,002§
Hypertension
125 (% 61,3)
94 (% 56)
0,323§
Smoking
96 (% 47,1)
56 (% 33,3)
0,007§
Alcohol consumption ≥ 20 g/day (± SD)
-
-
-
Body weight
Excessive weight
61 (% 29,9)
39 (% 23,2)
0§
Obesity
104 (% 51)
34 (% 20,2)
CAD disease
Non-obs CAD
50 (% 24,5)
39 (% 23,2)
0,002§
Obs CAD
57 (% 27,9)
23 (% 13,7)
P value was presented as a result of Student t-test.
P value was presented as a result of Pearson Chi-square test. SD: Standart
deviation; HU: Haunsfiled Unit; a/d: Antidiabetic agent; CAD: Coronary
artery disease; non-obs: Non-obstructive; obs: Obstructive.
Table 2
Statistical effect of different characteristics in groups
Unadjusted OR
%95 CI
p value
Adjusted OR
%95 CI
p value
Age (± SD)
1,082
1,039-1,127
0,000
1,065
1,029-1,101
0,000
Gender
2,498
0,972-6,425
0,057
-
-
-
Dyslipidemia
0,111
0,035-0,355
0,000
0,121
0,039-0,377
0,000
Smoking
1,883
0,840-4,223
0,125
-
-
-
OR: Odds Ratio; SD: Standart deviation.
Data and statistical results about groupsP value was presented as a result of Student t-test.P value was presented as a result of Pearson Chi-square test. SD: Standart
deviation; HU: Haunsfiled Unit; a/d: Antidiabetic agent; CAD: Coronary
artery disease; non-obs: Non-obstructive; obs: Obstructive.Statistical effect of different characteristics in groupsOR: Odds Ratio; SD: Standart deviation.
Results
According to hepatic density measurements of the 372 individuals participated in the
study, 204 (149 males, 54.8%) had non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Group 1) whereas
168 (95 males, 45.2%) were normal (Group 2). The present study found that the difference
between the prevalence of coronary artery disease found in the group with NAFLD and in
the group with normal liver tissue was statistically significant.All subjects were examined for coronary artery disease including smoking, hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and familial coronary artery disease. The age
distribution of the participants ranged between 24 and 74 years (y) (mean ± standard
deviation 49.6 ± 11.2 y). Of these, 244 (65.6%) were male and 128 (34.4%) were female.
The mean attenuation value of the liver parenchyma was measured to be 52 ± 11.9 HU
(range, 14-75). While the number of patients with hypertension (HT) was 102 (27.4%), the
number of patients with dyslipidemia was 131 (35.2%). Among the participants, 239
(64.2%) had not diabetes mellitus (DM), the number of those receiving an antidiabetic
agent was 133 (35.8%); 96 (25.8%) of them were receiving an oral antidiabetic agent and
37 (9.9%) of them were receiving a parenteral antidiabetic agent. There were 152 (40.9%)
active smokers and 220 (59.1%) nonsmokers. Based on BMI, 96 (25%) patients were
normal-weight, 149 (40.1%) were over-weight and 127 (34.1%) were obese. Fatty liver
disease was detected in 168 (45.2%) of study participants. Number of patients with
normal liver was 204 (54.8%). (Table 3)
Table 3
Data about study participants
All participants ( n = 372)
Age (± SD)
49.6 ± 11,2 years( range 24-74 years)
Gender (male)
244 (65,6%)
Hepatic density (HU)
52 ± 11.9 HU (range, 14-75 HU)
Diabetes
Nondiabetic
239 (64.2%)
Oral a/d
96 (25.8%)
parenteral a/d
37 (9.9%)
Dyslipidemia
131 (35,2%)
Hypertension
102 (27,4%)
Smoking ( active smokers)
152 (40,9%)
Alcohol consumption ≥ 20 g/day (± SD)
-
Body weight
Excessive weight
149 (40.1%)
Obesity
127 (34.1%)
¥: P value was presented as a result of Student t-test. §: P value was
presented as a result of Pearson Chi-square test. SD: Standart deviation; HU:
Haunsfiled Unit; a/d: Antidiabetic agent.
Data about study participants¥: P value was presented as a result of Student t-test. §: P value was
presented as a result of Pearson Chi-square test. SD: Standart deviation; HU:
Haunsfiled Unit; a/d: Antidiabetic agent.The mean liver density was 43 ± 9.1 HU (range 14-56) in males, and 45.5 ± 8.4 HU (range
31-58) in females of Group 1. The corresponding figures were 61.8 ± 4.7 HU (range,
56-75), and 62.6 ± 5.7 HU (range, 54-74) in the males and females of Group 2,
respectively. Mean liver densities of the groups according to their ages are
demonstrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Mean hepatic density according to ages
Mean hepatic density according to agesEvaluation of the coronary arteries of the study participants revealed that 203 of them
(107 males, 52.7%) had normal coronary arteries, 89 (69 males, 77.5%) had non-obsCAD,
and 80 (68 males, 21.5%) had obsCAD.The number of males without coronary artery disease was 62 (41.6%), those with
non-obsCAD was 42 (28.2%), and those with obsCAD was 45 (30.2%) in Group 1. The number
of females without coronary artery disease was 35 (63.6%), with non-obsCAD was 8
(14.5%), and with obsCAD was 12 (21.8%).In Group 2, there were 45 (47.4%) males without coronary artery disease, 27 (28.4%)
males with non-obsCAD, and 23 (24.2%) males with obsCAD. The number of females without
coronary artery disease was 61 (83.6%), with non-obsCAD was 12 (16.4%), and with obsCAD
was 0 in Group 2.Individuals in Group 1 were older and dyslipidemic more than Group 2. In additionaly,
Group 1 has more males and smokers than the Group 2. These characteristics of persons
affected on obsCAD were evaluated with Binary Logistic Regresion Analysis in Table 3. Age and dyslipidemia affected on obsCAD
were considered statistical significant (p < 0.01).
Discussion
MSCT coronary angiography is an important method for detecting CAD in the early stage. A
study which compared MSCT angiography and invasive coronary angiography for the
evaluation of coronary arteries and coronary artery segments larger than 1.5 mm found
the sensitivity of MSCT angiography to be 94% and specificity to be 97%[14]. Besides, CT is also used for the
diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of
hepatic steatosis is 82% and 100%, respectively[9]. The present study used the hepatic CT images used in the MSCT
angiography scanning protocol.Based on MSCT, the present study found that coronary artery disease prevalence in
patients with NAFLD was significantly higher than that of those with normal liver tissue
(p < 0.01). Statistical comparison between the two groups is presented in Table 2.Studies from other countries reported that NAFLD was more common among females[15,16]. However, a study from Turkey found the frequency of non-alcoholic
hepatic steatosis to be lower in females (32.7%)[17]. Some prevalence studies verified the diagnosis of NAFLD in 76%
of 146 liver biopsy samples obtained from obesepatients that underwent bariatric
surgery; a smaller-scale study in Turkey, however, reported the prevalence of NAFLD to
be 72% among obesepatients[18,19].A gradually increasing number of studies indicate NAFLD as the hepatic manifestation of
metabolic syndrome[20,21]. Although metabolic syndrome is a well-known precursor
of CAD[22-24], the association between NAFLD and CAD remains unclear.There are studies demonstrating that proinflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis
factor alpha (TNF-α), C reactive protein (CRP) and plasminogen activator inhibitor I
(PAI-I) have been increased in patients with both NAFLD and CAD[25]. It has been emphasized that the
increase in proinflammatory markers enhances future CAD events[25]. It has been also highlighted that this might independ
from metabolic syndrome and related risk factors. Some studies conducted in insulin
users demonstrated that insulin resistance is a predictor for CAD events and plays an
important role in the development of unfavorable clinical outcomes for NAFLD
patients[26,27].Association between NAFLD, from simple steatosis to advanced form of NAFLD, and high
risk of CAD has been attributed to increased oxidative stress and subclinical
inflammation[26,28,29].A study conducted by Perseghin stated that NAFLD was characterized by the appearance of
early metabolic and vascular pathological changes of atherosclerosis. However, despite
all these findings, it has been emphasized that the evidences indicating the association
between NAFLD and CAD are weak[30].Although the close association between NAFLD and CAD has not been clarified yet, fat
deposition in NAFLD is considered to increase free fatty acids that lead to CAD by
causing low-grade inflammation[31]. The
presence of NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes has suggested NAFLD as a strong
predictor for CAD[32].Brea et al[33] found an association
between NAFLD and carotid atherosclerosis. Targher et al[34] suggested a relation between NAFLD and carotid artery
wall thickness in type 2 diabetes mellituspatients controlled with diet. Lin et
al[35] stated that NAFLD was an
independent risk factor for ischemic CAD.
Study Limitations
While measuring the liver density of some cases, the optimal selection of appropriate
hepatic regions not including vascular and biliary structures has not been possible
due to inadequate spatial resolution. During MSCT coronary angiography, we had
occasional difficulties in detecting the stenosis degree in massive calcified
plaques. Moreover, there have been difficulties in differentiating probable coronary
artery soft plaques from the respiratory artifacts on the images of the cases with
respiratory distress.
Conclusion
Based on MSCT, the present study found that the difference between the prevalence of
coronary artery disease found in the group with NAFLD and in the group with normal liver
tissue was statistically significant.We can say that the likelihood of CAD in individuals with hepatosteatosis not consuming
or consuming less than 20 g/day of alcohol is higher than in the individuals without
hepatosteatosis.We think that this hypothesis should be verified with larger studies.
Authors: Hanna-Maaria Lakka; David E Laaksonen; Timo A Lakka; Leo K Niskanen; Esko Kumpusalo; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Jukka T Salonen Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P E Morange; J F Renucci; M A Charles; M F Aillaud; F Giraud; M Grimaux; I Juhan-Vague Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Michaela Diamant; Rienk Nieuwland; Renée F Pablo; Augueste Sturk; Jan W A Smit; Jasper K Radder Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-11-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stuart P Weisberg; Daniel McCann; Manisha Desai; Michael Rosenbaum; Rudolph L Leibel; Anthony W Ferrante Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Mariely Mendes Furtado; Joana Érica Lima Rocha; Ana Victória da Silva Mendes; Renato Sampaio Mello Neto; Ana Karolinne da Silva Brito; José Otávio Carvalho Sena de Almeida; Emerson Iuri Rodrigues Queiroz; José Vinícius de Sousa França; Ana Lina de Carvalho Cunha Sales; Andreanne Gomes Vasconcelos; Wanessa Felix Cabral; Luana de Oliveira Lopes; Iolanda Souza do Carmo; Selma Aparecida Souza Kückelhaus; José Roberto de Souza de Almeida Leite; Adriana Maria Viana Nunes; Marcia Dos Santos Rizzo; Antônia Maria das Graças Lopes Citó; Ana Karina Marques Fortes Lustosa; Massimo Lucarini; Alessandra Durazzo; Maria do Carmo de Carvalho E Martins; Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2022-01-27