Literature DB >> 24263599

Honeybee response to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays.

L A Kaminski1, K N Slessor, M L Winston, N W Hay, J H Borden.   

Abstract

Quantitative laboratory biosassays measuring short-range attraction of worker honeybees to pheromone-treated pipets or glass pseudo-queens are described. Each replicate involves only 15 workers, allowing a single colony to provide sufficient individuals for a complete study as well as for between-colony comparisons. The more sensitive pseudo-queen bioassay provides a measurable response at levels of queen mandibular extract of 10(-7) than that of an average individual mated queen. Formation and maintenance of the pseudo-queen's retinue, as well as more detailed behavior, can be evaluated by following the actions of individual workers replayed on video tape. Using this sensitive bioassay, the response of workers to queen mandibular pheromone has been shown to be sensitive to daily variation and colony source of the workers, but independent of worker age.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24263599     DOI: 10.1007/BF01016494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  1 in total

1.  Queen honey bee attractiveness as related to mandibular gland secretion.

Authors:  N E GARY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sex- and maturation-related variation in pheromone responses in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Gabriel Villar; Thomas C Baker; Harland M Patch; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone.

Authors:  Christopher I Keeling; Keith N Slessor; Heather A Higo; Mark L Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Semiochemicals of the honeybee queen mandibular glands.

Authors:  K N Slessor; L A Kaminski; G G King; M L Winston
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Identification of a queen pheromone mediating the rearing of adult sexuals in the pharaoh ant Monomorium pharaonis.

Authors:  Ricardo Caliari Oliveira; Jonas Warson; David Sillam-Dussès; Beatriz Herrera-Malaver; Kevin Verstrepen; Jocelyn G Millar; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Mandibular gland components of european and africanized honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  T Pankiw; M L Winston; E Plettner; K N Slessor; J S Pettis; O R Taylor
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Resisting majesty: Apis cerana, has lower antennal sensitivity and decreased attraction to queen mandibular pheromone than Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Shihao Dong; Ping Wen; Qi Zhang; Xinyu Li; Ken Tan; James Nieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Antenna movements as a function of odorants' biological value in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Hanna Cholé; Alice Merlin; Nicholas Henderson; Estelle Paupy; Prisca Mahé; Gérard Arnold; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Effects of insemination quantity on honey bee queen physiology.

Authors:  Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chemical profiles of two pheromone glands are differentially regulated by distinct mating factors in honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Elina L Niño; Osnat Malka; Abraham Hefetz; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Queen Reproductive Potential Affects Queen Mandibular Gland Pheromone Composition and Worker Retinue Response.

Authors:  Juliana Rangel; Katalin Böröczky; Coby Schal; David R Tarpy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.