Literature DB >> 24263589

Branch-cutting behavior by the vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) : A mechanism to decrease toxicity of secondary metabolites in conifers.

J Roy1, J M Bergeron.   

Abstract

While investigating the preferences of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) toward various coniferous species, we noted they often cut the branches of young trees, and then left them lying on the snow for two days or more before eating them completely. We tested whether this "behavioral manipulation" of a potential food resource resulted in a decrease in the level of secondary metabolites in branches. We found that after being cut for more than three days, the branches of young conifers had significantly less phenolics and condensed tannins. These postmanipulation levels of secondary metabolites were similar to those found in preferred summer food resources. Voles were thus capable of transforming a low-quality resource into one that was more compatible with their feeding patterns and detoxification mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24263589     DOI: 10.1007/BF01016484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  11 in total

1.  Distribution of birch (Betula SPP.), willow (Salix SPP.), and poplar (Populus SPP.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores.

Authors:  R T Palo
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Condensed tannins deter feeding by browsing ruminants in a South African savanna.

Authors:  S M Cooper; N Owen-Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Chemical analysis of phenolic glycosides: art, facts, and artifacts.

Authors:  R L Lindroth; M S Pajutee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Defining "high quality" food resources of herbivores: the case for meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).

Authors:  J M Bergeron; L Jodoin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Phenolic compounds of willow bark as deterrents against feeding by mountain hare.

Authors:  J Tahvanainen; E Helle; R Julkunen-Tiitto; A Lavola
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Defense of winter-dormant Alaska paper birch against snowshoe hares.

Authors:  Paul B Reichardt; John P Bryant; Thomas P Clausen; Gregory D Wieland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Plant phenolics as chemical defenses: Effects of natural phenolics on survival and growth of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

Authors:  R L Lindroth; G O Batzli
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Phytochemical deterrence of snowshoe hare browsing by adventitious shoots of four alaskan trees.

Authors:  J P Bryant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Lespedeza phenolics and Penstemon alkaloids: Effects on digestion efficiencies and growth of voles.

Authors:  R L Lindroth; G O Batzli; S I Avildsen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Camphor from juvenile white spruce as an antifeedant for snowshoe hares.

Authors:  A R Sinclair; M K Jogia; R J Andersen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral strategies of mammal herbivores against plant secondary metabolites: the avoidance-tolerance continuum.

Authors:  Glenn R Iason; Juan J Villalba
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Food processing by animals: do beavers leach tree bark to improve palatability?

Authors:  D Müller-Schwarze; H Brashear; R Kinnel; K A Hintz; A Lioubomirov; C Skibo
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Influence of the plant antifeedant, pinosylvin, on suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares.

Authors:  T P Sullivan; D R Crump; H Wieser; E A Dixon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Microsite affects willow sapling recovery from bank vole (Myodes glareolus) herbivory, but does not affect grazing risk.

Authors:  Rosalind F Shaw; Robin J Pakeman; Mark R Young; Glenn R Iason
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Disparate determinants of summer and winter diet selection of a generalist herbivore, Ochotona princeps.

Authors:  M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Preference of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) for conifer seedlings: Chemical components and nutritional quality of bark of damaged and undamaged trees.

Authors:  J D Bucyanayandi; J M Bergeron; H Menard
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Feeding rates of Balloniscus sellowii (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea): the effect of leaf litter decomposition and its relation to the phenolic and flavonoid content.

Authors:  Camila Timm Wood; Carolina Casco Duarte Schlindwein; Geraldo Luiz Gonçalves Soares; Paula Beatriz Araujo
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Pretty Picky for a Generalist: Impacts of Toxicity and Nutritional Quality on Mantid Prey Processing.

Authors:  Jamie L Rafter; Justin F Vendettuoli; Liahna Gonda-King; Daniel Niesen; Navindra P Seeram; Chad M Rigsby; Evan L Preisser
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.