Deepa L Sekhar1, Sarah J Clark2, Matthew M Davis2, Dianne C Singer2, Ian M Paul3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor3Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania4Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Data indicate that 1 in 6 adolescents has high-frequency hearing loss, which is typically noise related and preventable. Parental participation improves the success of adolescent behavioral interventions, yet little is known about parental perspectives regarding adolescent noise-induced hearing loss. OBJECTIVE: To perform a survey to determine parental knowledge of adolescent hearing loss and willingness to promote hearing conservation to discern information that is critical to design adolescent hearing loss prevention programs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional, Internet-based survey of a nationally representative online sample of parents of 13- to 17-year-olds. INTERVENTIONS: A survey conducted with the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, a recurring online survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Parental knowledge of adolescent hearing loss and willingness to promote hearing conservation. RESULTS: Of 716 eligible respondents, 96.3% of parents reported that their adolescent was slightly or not at all at risk of hearing problems from excessive noise, and 69.0% had not spoken with their adolescent about noise exposure, mainly because of the perceived low risk. Nonetheless, to protect their adolescents' hearing, more than 65.0% of parents are either willing or very willing to consider limiting time listening to music, limiting access to excessively noisy situations, or insisting on the use of hearing protection (earplugs or earmuffs). Higher parental education increased the odds of promoting hearing-protective strategies. Parents were less likely to insist on hearing protection for older adolescents. Parents who understood that both volume and time of exposure affect hearing damage were more likely to have discussed hearing loss with their adolescent (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.29-3.03). The odds of discussing hearing loss were also increased for those who were willing or very willing to limit time listening to music (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.19-2.26) and to insist on hearing protection (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.18) compared with parents who were very unwilling, unwilling, or neutral. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite the rising prevalence of acquired adolescent hearing loss, few parents believe their adolescent is at risk. Those with higher education are more willing to promote hearing conservation, especially with younger adolescents. To create effective hearing conservation programs, parents need better education on this subject as well as effective and acceptable strategies to prevent adolescent noise exposure.
IMPORTANCE: Data indicate that 1 in 6 adolescents has high-frequency hearing loss, which is typically noise related and preventable. Parental participation improves the success of adolescent behavioral interventions, yet little is known about parental perspectives regarding adolescent noise-induced hearing loss. OBJECTIVE: To perform a survey to determine parental knowledge of adolescent hearing loss and willingness to promote hearing conservation to discern information that is critical to design adolescent hearing loss prevention programs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional, Internet-based survey of a nationally representative online sample of parents of 13- to 17-year-olds. INTERVENTIONS: A survey conducted with the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, a recurring online survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Parental knowledge of adolescent hearing loss and willingness to promote hearing conservation. RESULTS: Of 716 eligible respondents, 96.3% of parents reported that their adolescent was slightly or not at all at risk of hearing problems from excessive noise, and 69.0% had not spoken with their adolescent about noise exposure, mainly because of the perceived low risk. Nonetheless, to protect their adolescents' hearing, more than 65.0% of parents are either willing or very willing to consider limiting time listening to music, limiting access to excessively noisy situations, or insisting on the use of hearing protection (earplugs or earmuffs). Higher parental education increased the odds of promoting hearing-protective strategies. Parents were less likely to insist on hearing protection for older adolescents. Parents who understood that both volume and time of exposure affect hearing damage were more likely to have discussed hearing loss with their adolescent (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.29-3.03). The odds of discussing hearing loss were also increased for those who were willing or very willing to limit time listening to music (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.19-2.26) and to insist on hearing protection (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.18) compared with parents who were very unwilling, unwilling, or neutral. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite the rising prevalence of acquired adolescent hearing loss, few parents believe their adolescent is at risk. Those with higher education are more willing to promote hearing conservation, especially with younger adolescents. To create effective hearing conservation programs, parents need better education on this subject as well as effective and acceptable strategies to prevent adolescent noise exposure.
Authors: Melissa A Pynnonen; Jaynee A Handelsman; Ericka F King; Dianne C Singer; Matthew M Davis; Marci M Lesperance Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Michelle H Moniz; Lauren K O'Connell; Anna Daly Kauffman; Dianne C Singer; Sarah J Clark; Matthew M Davis Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2016-02
Authors: Chunfeng Yun; Zhenjie Wang; Jiamin Gao; Ping He; Chao Guo; Gong Chen; Xiaoying Zheng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390