Literature DB >> 24263327

Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driven, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams.

Alexander F Arriaga1, Atul A Gawande, Daniel B Raemer, Daniel B Jones, Douglas S Smink, Peter Weinstock, Kathy Dwyer, Stuart R Lipsitz, Sarah Peyre, John B Pawlowski, Sharon Muret-Wagstaff, Denise Gee, James A Gordon, Jeffrey B Cooper, William R Berry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of implementing a standardized teamwork training program with full operating room teams in multiple institutions, driven by malpractice insurer support and incentives.
BACKGROUND: Failures in intraoperative teamwork are among the leading causes of preventable patient injury and death in surgical patients. Teamwork training, particularly using simulation, can be an effective intervention but is difficult to scale.
METHODS: A malpractice insurer convened a collaborative with 4 Harvard-affiliated simulation programs to develop a standardized operating room teamwork training curriculum, including principles of communication, assertiveness, and use of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist. Participant teams were compensated for lost operative time via malpractice premium discounts, continuing education credits, and compensation for lost wages. The course was delivered through a simulation program involving the management of intraoperative emergency scenarios. Participants were surveyed for their perceptions of the program and of its impact on clinical practice.
RESULTS: A total of 221 active operating room staff members participated in the program. Each team contained at least 1 attending surgeon, 1 attending anesthesiologist, and 1 operating room nurse (mean size per team: 7 ± 2 participants). No study dates were cancelled because of lack of attendance. The survey response rate was 99% (218/221). Overall, the vast majority of participants found the scenarios realistic [94% (95% confidence interval: 90.9%, 97.2%)], appropriately challenging [95.4% (92.6%, 98.2%)], relevant to their practice [96.3% (93.8%, 98.8%)], and found the training would help them provide safer patient care [92.6% (89.1%, 96.1%)]. Surgeons reported their greatest personal deficit as communication skills. Operating room nurses and anesthesiologists reported a greater need than surgeons to work on personal assertiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: A standardized multicenter team training program involving full operative teams is feasible with high-fidelity simulation and modest compensation for lost time. The vast majority of the multidisciplinary participants believed the course to have had a meaningful impact on their approach to clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24263327     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  It's better to be lucky.

Authors:  Daniel Bougère Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Identifying Opportunities for Virtual Reality Simulation in Surgical Education: A Review of the Proceedings from the Innovation, Design, and Emerging Alliances in Surgery (IDEAS) Conference: VR Surgery.

Authors:  Jaisa Olasky; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Neal E Seymour; J Harvey Magee; Andinet Enquobahrie; Ming C Lin; Rajesh Aggarwal; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao; Suvranu De; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Performance gaps and improvement plans from a 5-hospital simulation programme for anaesthesiology providers: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Samuel DeMaria; Adam Levine; Philip Petrou; David Feldman; Patricia Kischak; Amanda Burden; Andrew Goldberg
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Association of a Surgical Task During Training With Team Skill Acquisition Among Surgical Residents: The Missing Piece in Multidisciplinary Team Training.

Authors:  Jessica L Sparks; Dustin L Crouch; Kathryn Sobba; Douglas Evans; Jing Zhang; James E Johnson; Ian Saunders; John Thomas; Sarah Bodin; Ashley Tonidandel; Jeff Carter; Carl Westcott; R Shayn Martin; Amy Hildreth
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  The impact of team familiarity on intra and postoperative cardiac surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Steven Yule; Xiaoting Wu; Roger D Dias; Allison M Janda; Sarah L Krein; Milisa Manojlovich; Matthew D Caldwell; Korana Stakich-Alpirez; Min Zhang; Jason Corso; Nathan Louis; Tongbo Xu; Jeremy Wolverton; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  A survey-based cross-sectional study of doctors' expectations and experiences of non-technical skills for Out of Hours work.

Authors:  Michael Brown; Dominick Shaw; Sarah Sharples; Ivan Le Jeune; John Blakey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  "A debriefer must be neutral" and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing.

Authors:  Julia Carolin Seelandt; Katie Walker; Michaela Kolbe
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Incident reporting systems: a comparative study of two hospital divisions.

Authors:  Tanya Hewitt; Samia Chreim; Alan Forster
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Surgical Duration Implicated in Major Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark D Orland; Remy Y Lee; Edmund E Naami; Michael J Patetta; Awais K Hussain; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.