Literature DB >> 24263317

Liver transplantation in highest acuity recipients: identifying factors to avoid futility.

Henrik Petrowsky1, Abbas Rana, Fady M Kaldas, Anuj Sharma, Johnny C Hong, Vatche G Agopian, Francisco Durazo, Henry Honda, Jeffrey Gornbein, Victor Wu, Douglas G Farmer, Jonathan R Hiatt, Ronald W Busuttil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify medical predictors of futility in recipients with laboratory Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of 40 or more at the time of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
BACKGROUND: Although the survival benefit for transplant patients with the highest MELD scores is indisputable, the medical and economic effort to bring these highest acuity recipients through OLT presents a major challenge for every transplant center.
METHODS: This study was undertaken to analyze outcomes in patients with MELD scores of 40 or more undergoing OLT during the period February 2002 to December 2010. The analysis was focused on futile outcome (3-month or in-hospital mortality) and long-term posttransplant outcome. Independent predictors of futility and failure-free survival were identified and a futility risk model was created.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1522 adult cadaveric OLTs were performed, and 169 patients (13%) had a MELD score of 40 or more. The overall 1, 3, 5, and 8-year patient survivals were 72%, 64%, 60%, and 56%. Futile outcome occurred in 37 patients (22%). MELD score, pretransplant septic shock, cardiac risk, and comorbidities were independent predictors of futile outcome. Using all 4 factors, the futility risk model had a good discriminatory ability (c-statistic 0.75). Recipient age per year, life-threatening postoperative complications, hepatitis C, and metabolic syndrome were independent predictors for long-term survival in nonfutile patients (Harrels c-statistic 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term outcomes of recipients with MELD scores of 40 or more are primarily determined by disease-specific factors. Cardiac risk, pretransplant septic shock, and comorbidities are the most important predictors and can be used for risk stratification in these highest acuity recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24263317     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  38 in total

1.  Delta MELD as a predictor of early outcome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Şencan Acar; Murat Akyıldız; Ahmet Gürakar; Yaman Tokat; Murat Dayangaç
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Transoesophageal echocardiography during liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lesley De Pietri; Federico Mocchegiani; Chiara Leuzzi; Roberto Montalti; Marco Vivarelli; Vanni Agnoletti
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-18

Review 3.  Palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  Anne M Larson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-05

4.  Statistical approach to quality assessment in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Sophia Volz; Hans-Friedrich Koch; Jill Gwiasda; Priscila Kürsch; Alon Goldis; Daniel Pöhnert; Markus Winny; Jürgen Klempnauer; Alexander Kaltenborn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  PRO: Older Adults Should Be Offered Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Lamia Haque; Chiara Saroli Palumbo; Jennifer Batisti
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-09-02

6.  Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience.

Authors:  Hina J Panchal; Joel B Durinka; Jeromy Patterson; Farah Karipineni; Sarah Ashburn; Eric Siskind; Jorge Ortiz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Spyridon Vernadakis; Andreas Paul; Dieter P Hoyer; Fuat H Saner; Anja Gallinat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Living Donor Liver Transplantation in South Asia: Single Center Experience on Intermediate-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Faisal S Dar; Abu Bakar H Bhatti; Ammal I Qureshi; Nusrat Y Khan; Zahaan Eswani; Haseeb H Zia; Eitzaz U Khan; Nasir A Khan; Atif Rana; Najmul H Shah; Mohammad Salih; Rashid Nazer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Comparable short- and long-term outcomes in deceased-donor and living-donor liver retransplantation.

Authors:  Kenneth Siu Ho Chok; Albert C Y Chan; James Y Y Fung; Wing Chiu Dai; Tan To Cheung; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 10.  Systemic hemodynamics in advanced cirrhosis: Concerns during perioperative period of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Yasuhiro Ogura; Yasuharu Onishi; Hideya Kamei; Nobuhiko Kurata; Motoshi Kainuma; Hideo Takahashi; Shogo Suzuki; Takashi Ichikawa; Shoko Mizuno; Tadashi Aoyama; Yuki Ishida; Takahiro Hirai; Tomoko Hayashi; Kazuko Hasegawa; Hiromu Takeichi; Atsunobu Ota; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Taku Iida; Shintaro Yagi; Kentaro Taniguchi; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.