Literature DB >> 24263086

The effect of small tumor volumes on studies of intratumoral heterogeneity of tracer uptake.

Frank J Brooks1, Perry W Grigsby.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The number of studies in the literature involving quantification of the metabolic heterogeneity seen in (18)F-FDG PET images has increased sharply over recent years. We hypothesized that inclusion of very small regions of interest as unique data points will have deleterious effects on these studies.
METHODS: Using a combination of probability theory and clinical (18)F-FDG PET data, we numerically calculated the curve describing the probability a given tumor volume is large enough to adequately sample the underlying tumor biology assayed via a PET/CT scanner at a planar resolution of 4 mm and transaxial resolution of 4 mm (64 mm(3) voxel size). We then used a computer simulation to isolate the effects of tumor volume on the image local entropy.
RESULTS: We computed the underlying global intensity distribution for 70 cervical cancer tumors ranging from 4 to 248 cm(3)), which were ensemble-averaged over the same intensity scale. From this distribution, we determined that about 700 total voxels (45 cm(3)) are required to give 95% certainty that the global intensity distribution has been sufficiently sampled for common statistical comparisons of individual tumor intensity distributions to be made canonically. We demonstrated that one previously suggested measure of heterogeneity is dependent on tumor volume and that measurement of heterogeneity is about 5 times more sensitive to volume changes for volumes below the proposed minimum than for those above it.
CONCLUSION: Inclusion of tumor volumes below 45 cm(3) can profoundly bias comparisons of intratumoral uptake heterogeneity metrics derived from data from the current generation of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET scanners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; cancer of the uterine cervix; local entropy; positron emission tomography; texture analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24263086      PMCID: PMC4017737          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  11 in total

Review 1.  Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Stephen L Bacharach; Irène Buvat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Mathieu Hatt; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Adrien Le Pogam; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Quantitative assessment of heterogeneity in tumor metabolism using FDG-PET.

Authors:  Dennis Vriens; Jonathan A Disselhorst; Wim J G Oyen; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Mathieu Hatt; Nidal Albarghach; Olivier Pradier; Jean-Philippe Metges; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes.

Authors:  I El Naqa; P Grigsby; A Apte; E Kidd; E Donnelly; D Khullar; S Chaudhari; D Yang; M Schmitt; Richard Laforest; W Thorstad; J O Deasy
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.740

7.  Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kidd; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A statistical measure of tissue heterogeneity with application to 3D PET sarcoma data.

Authors:  Finbarr O'Sullivan; Supratik Roy; Janet Eary
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Quantification of heterogeneity observed in medical images.

Authors:  Frank J Brooks; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 10.  Warburg revisited: imaging tumour blood flow and metabolism.

Authors:  K A Miles; R E Williams
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  64 in total

1.  CT-based Radiomic Signatures for Predicting Histopathologic Features in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pritam Mukherjee; Murilo Cintra; Chao Huang; Mu Zhou; Shankuan Zhu; A Dimitrios Colevas; Nancy Fischbein; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Value of FDG PET Quantitative Imaging Features Combined with Clinical Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  David V Fried; Osama Mawlawi; Lifei Zhang; Xenia Fave; Shouhao Zhou; Geoffrey Ibbott; Zhongxing Liao; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Prediction of local relapse and distant metastasis in patients with definitive chemoradiotherapy-treated cervical cancer by deep learning from [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Wei-Chih Shen; Shang-Wen Chen; Kuo-Chen Wu; Te-Chun Hsieh; Ji-An Liang; Yao-Ching Hung; Lian-Shung Yeh; Wei-Chun Chang; Wu-Chou Lin; Kuo-Yang Yen; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Preoperative prediction of regional lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and machine learning.

Authors:  Jiahong He; Quanshi Wang; Yin Zhang; Hubing Wu; Yongsheng Zhou; Shuangquan Zhao
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  Correlation between tumour characteristics, SUV measurements, metabolic tumour volume, TLG and textural features assessed with 18F-FDG PET in a large cohort of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Charles Lemarignier; Antoine Martineau; Luis Teixeira; Laetitia Vercellino; Marc Espié; Pascal Merlet; David Groheux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The precision of textural analysis in (18)F-FDG-PET scans of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Georgia Doumou; Musib Siddique; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Vicky Goh; Gary J Cook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  S Alobaidli; S McQuaid; C South; V Prakash; P Evans; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Radiomics in Oncological PET/CT: Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Sang Mi Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-20

Review 9.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future?

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Florent Tixier; Larry Pierce; Paul E Kinahan; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Correlations between metabolic texture features, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation burden in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Moon; Jinho Kim; Je-Gun Joung; Hongui Cha; Woong-Yang Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Myung-Ju Ahn; Keunchil Park; Joon Young Choi; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim; Se-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.