Literature DB >> 24262768

Clinical practice guidelines: potential misconceptions of the GRADE approach.

Joseph Watine1, Julien Wils, Christine Augereau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To challenge the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) group to address the potential misconceptions about their approach to grading the strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Based on our own expertise of health care professionals trying to think in depth about, and using, guidelines, we have identified four such misconceptions.
RESULTS: These potential misconceptions are: (1) evidence in medicine means factual or scientific evidence; (2) opinions are a subcategory of evidence; (3) the most important evidence is related to clinical benefits and harms; (4) being virtuous, and principled, does not particularly help in developing the best possible guidelines.
CONCLUSION: We call on the GRADE leadership to address all the above-mentioned misconceptions. These need explicit answers in their manuscript series.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Emotions; Evidence; Guidelines; Judgments; Opinions; Values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24262768     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  2 in total

1.  Why would medical publishers not incorporate core bioethical values into their Ethics Guidelines?

Authors:  Joseph Watine
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

2.  A systematic review of guidelines for managing rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Aneela Mian; Fowzia Ibrahim; David L Scott
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.