Literature DB >> 24262620

Randomized comparison of distal and proximal cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting.

Manuel N Cano1, Antônio M Kambara, Silvia J F de Cano, Luiz Antônio Pezzi Portela, Ângela Tavares Paes, J Ribamar Costa, Alexandre Antônio Cunha Abizaid, Samuel Martins Moreira, Amanda G M R Sousa, J Eduardo Moraes Rego Sousa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to randomly compare cerebral protection with ANGIOGUARD (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey) with Mo.Ma (Invatec/Medtronic Vascular Inc, Santa Rosa, California) during carotid artery stenting (CAS), using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to detect new ischemic cerebral lesions. The number, size, and location of lesions were analyzed.
BACKGROUND: The choice of the type of cerebral protection during CAS is controversial.
METHODS: From July 2008 to July 2011, 60 patients undergoing CAS were randomized to ANGIOGUARD or Mo.Ma, distributed by chance, 30 patients for each group. All patients underwent DW-MRI before and after CAS. An independent neuroradiologist blinded to the cerebral protection used analyzed the images. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were fitted to analyze new ischemic lesions. Alternatively, a propensity score approach was used to reduce the bias due to differences between the groups. For the number of lesions, we used Poisson regression models.
RESULTS: New ischemic lesions seen on DW-MRI were present in 63.3% of the ANGIOGUARD group versus 66.7% of the Mo.Ma cohort (p = 0.787). The number of ischemic cerebral lesions per patient, when present, was significantly lower in the Mo.Ma group (a median of 6 lesions per patient vs. a median of 10 in the ANGIOGUARD, p < 0.001). Most lesions were small (<0.5 mm) and localized in the ipsilateral territory. One patient in the ANGIOGUARD group had a minor stroke during CAS (1.66%).
CONCLUSIONS: New ischemic lesions seen on DW-MRI were present in both groups in >60%, but the number of lesions per patient was greater in the ANGIOGUARD group. No death or disabling stroke occurred during at least 1 year of follow-up in both cohorts.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAS; CEA; CPD; DW-MRI; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy; cerebral protection device; diffusion-weighted MRI; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262620     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  8 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Interventions for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update.

Authors:  Josephine F Huang; James F Meschia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-05

3.  Safety of carotid artery stenting for elderly patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Takahito Okazaki; Jumpei Oshita; Masashi Kuwabara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Traenka; Stefan T Engelter; Martin M Brown; Joanna Dobson; Chris Frost; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-01-15

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Flow Reversal in Acute and Elective Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Using the Mo.Ma Device with Short-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ambooj Tiwari; Ryan Bo; Keithan Sivakumar; Karthikeyan M Arcot; Philip Ye; David T Parrella; Jeffrey Farkas
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 6.  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: What we can learn from the next generation of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Mark N Rubin; Kevin M Barrett; Thomas G Brott; James F Meschia
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-04-08

7.  Mid-term and late results of endovascular treatment for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis under proximal protection.

Authors:  Paweł Latacz; Marian Simka; Marcin Krzanowski; Katarzyna Krzanowska; Paweł Brzegowy; Bartłomiej Łasocha; Tadeusz J Popiela
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 8.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.