PURPOSE: We compared slow vs fast shock wave frequency rates in disintegration of pediatric renal stones less than 20 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 60 children with solitary 10 to 20 mm radiopaque renal stones treated withshock wave lithotripsy. Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups, ie those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 80 shock waves per minute (group 1, 30 patients) and those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 120 shock waves per minute (group 2, 30 patients). The 2 groups were compared in terms of treatment success, anesthesia time, secondary procedures and efficiency quotient. RESULTS:Stone clearance rate was significantly higher in group 1 (90%) than in group 2 (73.3%, p = 0.025). A total of 18 patients in group 1 (60%) were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 8 required 2 sessions and 1 needed 3 sessions, while shock wave lithotripsy failed in 3 patients. By comparison, 8 patients (26.6%) in group 2 were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 10 (33.3%) required 2 sessions and 4 (13.3%) needed 3 sessions to become stone-free. Mean general anesthesia time was significantly longer in group 1 (p = 0.041). Postoperatively 2 patients in group 1 and 4 in group 2 suffered low grade fever (Clavien grade II). Significantly more secondary procedures (percutaneous nephrolithotomy, repeat shock wave lithotripsy) were required in group 2 (p = 0.005). The predominant stone analysis was calcium oxalate dihydrate in both groups. Efficiency quotient was 0.5869 and 0.3437 for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0.0247). CONCLUSIONS: In children with renal stones slow delivery rates of shock wave lithotripsy have better results regarding stone clearance than fast delivery rates.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We compared slow vs fast shock wave frequency rates in disintegration of pediatric renal stones less than 20 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 60 children with solitary 10 to 20 mm radiopaque renal stones treated with shock wave lithotripsy. Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups, ie those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 80 shock waves per minute (group 1, 30 patients) and those undergoing lithotripsy at a rate of 120 shock waves per minute (group 2, 30 patients). The 2 groups were compared in terms of treatment success, anesthesia time, secondary procedures and efficiency quotient. RESULTS: Stone clearance rate was significantly higher in group 1 (90%) than in group 2 (73.3%, p = 0.025). A total of 18 patients in group 1 (60%) were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 8 required 2 sessions and 1 needed 3 sessions, while shock wave lithotripsy failed in 3 patients. By comparison, 8 patients (26.6%) in group 2 were rendered stone-free after 1 session, 10 (33.3%) required 2 sessions and 4 (13.3%) needed 3 sessions to become stone-free. Mean general anesthesia time was significantly longer in group 1 (p = 0.041). Postoperatively 2 patients in group 1 and 4 in group 2 suffered low grade fever (Clavien grade II). Significantly more secondary procedures (percutaneous nephrolithotomy, repeat shock wave lithotripsy) were required in group 2 (p = 0.005). The predominant stone analysis was calcium oxalate dihydrate in both groups. Efficiency quotient was 0.5869 and 0.3437 for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0.0247). CONCLUSIONS: In children with renal stones slow delivery rates of shock wave lithotripsy have better results regarding stone clearance than fast delivery rates.
Authors: Michael E Chua; Jin Kyu Kim; Jessica M Ming; Keara N De Cotiis; Stephen S Yang; Mandy Rickard; Armando J Lorenzo; Joana Dos Santos Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 2.003
Authors: Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mohamed Shoeb; Mahmoud A Mahmoud; Diaa Eldin Mostafa; Mohamed Hasan; Hany M Abdalla Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Dong Hyuk Kang; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Hyungmin Lee; Jong Kyou Kwon; Young Deuk Choi; Joo Yong Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240