Literature DB >> 24262429

Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?

Nuno Ferreira da Cruz1, Sandra Ferreira2, Marta Cabral2, Pedro Simões2, Rui Cunha Marques2.   

Abstract

This paper describes and examines the schemes established in five EU countries for the recycling of packaging waste. The changes in packaging waste management were mainly implemented since the Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste entered into force. The analysis of the five systems allowed the authors to identify very different approaches to cope with the same problem: meet the recovery and recycling targets imposed by EU law. Packaging waste is a responsibility of the industry. However, local governments are generally in charge of waste management, particularly in countries with Green Dot schemes or similar extended producer responsibility systems. This leads to the need of establishing a system of financial transfers between the industry and the local governments (particularly regarding the extra costs involved with selective collection and sorting). Using the same methodological approach, the authors also compare the costs and benefits of recycling from the perspective of local public authorities for France, Portugal and Romania. Since the purpose of the current paper is to take note of who is paying for the incremental costs of recycling and whether the industry (i.e. the consumer) is paying for the net financial costs of packaging waste management, environmental impacts are not included in the analysis. The work carried out in this paper highlights some aspects that are prone to be improved and raises several questions that will require further research. In the three countries analyzed more closely in this paper the industry is not paying the net financial cost of packaging waste management. In fact, if the savings attained by diverting packaging waste from other treatment (e.g. landfilling) and the public subsidies to the investment on the "recycling system" are not considered, it seems that the industry should increase the financial support to local authorities (by 125% in France, 50% in Portugal and 170% in Romania). However, in France and Portugal the industry is paying local authorities more than just the incremental costs of recycling (full costs of selective collection and sorting minus the avoided costs). To provide a more definitive judgment on the fairness of the systems it will be necessary to assess the cost efficiency of waste management operators (and judge whether operators are claiming costs or eliciting "prices").
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Europe; Extended producer responsibility; Green Dot; Packaging waste; Recycling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262429     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  4 in total

1.  Renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions from the waste sectors of European Union member states: a panel data analysis.

Authors:  Hélde Araujo Domingos; Alexandre Magno De Melo Faria; José Alberto Fuinhas; António Cardoso Marques
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Hydrophobic Organic Pollutants in Soils and Dusts at Electronic Waste Recycling Sites: Occurrence and Possible Impacts of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers.

Authors:  Chimere May Ohajinwa; Peter M Van Bodegom; Qing Xie; Jingwen Chen; Martina G Vijver; Oladele O Osibanjo; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Research on the Evolution of the Express Packaging Recycling Strategy, Considering Government Subsidies and Synergy Benefits.

Authors:  Yanlu Guo; Gongli Luo; Guisheng Hou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Consumer Cognition and Management Perspective on Express Packaging Pollution.

Authors:  Sisi Wu; Xuan Gong; Yunfei Wang; Jian Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.