David T Levy1, An-Tsun Huang2, Laura M Currie3, Luke Clancy2. 1. Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland and TobaccoFree Research Institute Ireland, Dublin 8, Ireland dl777@georgetown.edu. 2. Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland and TobaccoFree Research Institute Ireland, Dublin 8, Ireland. 3. Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland and TobaccoFree Research Institute Ireland, Dublin 8, Ireland Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland and TobaccoFree Research Institute Ireland, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This article compares the predicted impact of tobacco tax increases alone and as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) across 15 European countries. METHODS: Country-specific population, smoking prevalence and policy data with modified parameter values have been applied to the previously validated SimSmoke model for 10 high-income and 5 middle-income European nations. The impact of past and potential future policies is modelled. RESULTS: Models generally validated well across the 15 countries, and showed the impact of past policies. Without stronger future policies, 44 million lives would be lost due to smoking across the 15 study countries between 2011 and 2040, but effective policies could avert 7.7 million of those premature deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that past policies have been effective in reducing smoking rates, but there is also a strong potential for future policies consistent with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. When specific taxes are increased to 70% of retail price, strong smoke-free air laws, youth access laws and marketing restrictions are enforced, stronger health warnings are implemented, and cessation treatment and media campaigns are supported, smoking prevalence and SADs will fall substantially in European countries. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
INTRODUCTION: This article compares the predicted impact of tobacco tax increases alone and as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) across 15 European countries. METHODS: Country-specific population, smoking prevalence and policy data with modified parameter values have been applied to the previously validated SimSmoke model for 10 high-income and 5 middle-income European nations. The impact of past and potential future policies is modelled. RESULTS: Models generally validated well across the 15 countries, and showed the impact of past policies. Without stronger future policies, 44 million lives would be lost due to smoking across the 15 study countries between 2011 and 2040, but effective policies could avert 7.7 million of those premature deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that past policies have been effective in reducing smoking rates, but there is also a strong potential for future policies consistent with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. When specific taxes are increased to 70% of retail price, strong smoke-free air laws, youth access laws and marketing restrictions are enforced, stronger health warnings are implemented, and cessation treatment and media campaigns are supported, smoking prevalence and SADs will fall substantially in European countries. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; James F Thrasher; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; K Michael Cummings; Rafael Meza; Yian Zhang; David T Levy Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2016-02-02
Authors: Eric D Vugrin; Brian L Rostron; Stephen J Verzi; Nancy S Brodsky; Theresa J Brown; Conrad J Choiniere; Blair N Coleman; Antonio Paredes; Benjamin J Apelberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chris Kypridemos; Kirk Allen; Graeme L Hickey; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Piotr Bandosz; Iain Buchan; Simon Capewell; Martin O'Flaherty Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-06-08
Authors: Kirk Allen; Chris Kypridemos; Lirije Hyseni; Anna B Gilmore; Peter Diggle; Margaret Whitehead; Simon Capewell; Martin O'Flaherty Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 3.295