Literature DB >> 24262059

The most effective rescuer's position for cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided to patients on beds: a randomized, controlled, crossover mannequin study.

Chong Kun Hong1, Sang O Park2, Han Ho Jeong3, Jung Hyun Kim3, Na Kyoung Lee4, Kyoung Yul Lee5, Younghwan Lee6, Jun Ho Lee4, Seong Youn Hwang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of chest compressions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by the rescuer's position with respect to the patient. In hospitals, chest compressions are typically performed while standing beside the patient, who is placed on a bed. STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of chest compressions, performed on a bed during 2 min of CPR, among three different rescuer positions: standing, on a footstool, or kneeling on the bed.
METHODS: We performed a crossover randomized simulation trial. Participants were recruited from among students in the Department of Paramedics from July to August 2011. Thirty-eight participants were enrolled, and they performed chest compressions on a mannequin for 2 min in each of the three different positions, with a 1-week interval between each position.
RESULTS: The number of adequate compressions (depth > 50 mm) and the mean compression depth were significantly greater in the kneeling and footstool positions than in the standing position, but there was no significant difference between the kneeling and footstool positions. There were no significant differences in the compression rate, the percentage of correctly released compressions, and the percentage of compressions performed using the correct hand position among the three rescuer positions.
CONCLUSION: The mean compression depth and the number of adequate compressions were greater for both the kneeling and footstool positions than for the standing position during 2 min of CPR. We recommend kneeling on a bed or standing on a footstool as the rescuer positions during hospital CPR on a bed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beds; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; fatigue; heart massage; position

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262059     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of Chest Compressions Performed on Patients in Dental Chairs Versus on the Floor.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Shimizu; Takuma Sadamori; Noboru Saeki; Akari Mukai; Mitsuru Doi; Kana Oue; Mitsuhiro Yoshida; Masahiro Irifune
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 2.  Randomized controlled trials of simulation-based interventions in Emergency Medicine: a methodological review.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Jennifer Truchot; Aida Bafeta; Dominique Pateron; Patrick Plaisance; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Comparisons of the Pentax-AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Intubation Performance during Mechanical Chest Compressions in Left Lateral Tilt: A Randomized Simulation Study of Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Sanghyun Lee; Wonhee Kim; Hyunggoo Kang; Jaehoon Oh; Tae Ho Lim; Yoonjae Lee; Changsun Kim; Jun Hwi Cho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Study of Factors Influencing Chest Compression Depth.

Authors:  Kelsey P Mayrand; Eric J Fischer; Raymond P Ten Eyck
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-13

5.  Comparison of the Pentax Airwayscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope During Chest Compression According to Bed Height.

Authors:  Wonhee Kim; Yoonje Lee; Changsun Kim; Tae Ho Lim; Jaehoon Oh; Hyunggoo Kang; Sanghyun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.