Literature DB >> 24261654

Dust measurement of two organophosphorus flame retardants, resorcinol bis(diphenylphosphate) (RBDPP) and bisphenol A bis(diphenylphosphate) (BPA-BDPP), used as alternatives for BDE-209.

Sicco H Brandsma1, Ulla Sellström, Cynthia A de Wit, Jacob de Boer, Pim E G Leonards.   

Abstract

Resorcinol bis(diphenylphosphate) (RBDPP) and bisphenol A bis(diphenylphosphate) (BPA-BDPP) are two halogen-free organophosphorus flame retardant (PFRs) that are used as an alternative for the decabromodiphenyl ether (Deca-BDE) technical mixture in TV/flatscreen housing and other electronic consumer products. In this study, dust samples were collected from various microenvironments in The Netherlands (houses, cars), Greece (houses), and Sweden (apartments, cars, furniture stores, electronics stores) and analyzed for RBDPP and BPA-BDPP. Additionally, the dust samples from The Netherlands were analyzed for decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) for comparison and for TPHP, which is a byproduct in the RBDPP and BPA-BDPP technical products. BPA-BDPP was detected in almost all dust samples from The Netherlands, Greece, and Sweden. Highest concentrations were found in dust samples collected on electronic equipment from all three countries with BPA-BDPP levels ranging from <0.1 to 1300 μg/g and RBDPP levels from <0.04 to 520 μg/g. RBDPP and BPA-BDPP levels in dust collected further away from the electronics (source) were usually lower. BDE-209 levels in The Netherlands dust samples collected on and around the electronics were similar and much lower than the BPA-BDPP/RBDPP levels, indicating that the electronics were not the source of BDE-209. Strong positive correlations were found between TPHP concentrations and those of RBDPP (r = 0.805) and BPA-BDPP (r = 0.924), probably due to TPHP being a byproduct in commercial RBDPP and BPA-BDPP mixtures in electronics. To our knowledge, this is the first time that RBDPP and BPA-BDPP were detected in dust samples from Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24261654     DOI: 10.1021/es404123q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Predictors of urinary flame retardant concentration among pregnant women.

Authors:  Kate Hoffman; Amelia Lorenzo; Craig M Butt; Linda Adair; Amy H Herring; Heather M Stapleton; Julie L Daniels
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Screening of additives in plastics with high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry and different ionization sources: direct probe injection (DIP)-APCI, LC-APCI, and LC-ion booster ESI.

Authors:  Ana Ballesteros-Gómez; Tim Jonkers; Adrian Covaci; Jacob de Boer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Identifying Chemical Groups for Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Gail Krowech; Sara Hoover; Laurel Plummer; Martha Sandy; Lauren Zeise; Gina Solomon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Transformation Products of Emerging Pollutants Explored Using Non-Target Screening: Perspective in the Transformation Pathway and Toxicity Mechanism-A Review.

Authors:  Thodhal-Yoganandham Suman; Soo-Yeon Kim; Dong-Hyuk Yeom; Junho Jeon
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.