Literature DB >> 24261051

Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates.

Vincenzo Gervasi1, Hakan Sand, Barbara Zimmermann, Jenny Mattisson, Petter Wabakken, John D C Linnell.   

Abstract

Recolonizing carnivores can have a large impact on the status of wild ungulates, which have often modified their behavior in the absence of predation. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of reestablished predator-prey systems is crucial to predict their potential ecosystem effects. We decomposed the spatial structure of predation by recolonizing wolves (Canis lupus) on two sympatric ungulates, moose (Alces alces) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), in Scandinavia during a 10-year study. We monitored 18 wolves with GPS collars, distributed over 12 territories, and collected records from predation events. By using conditional logistic regression, we assessed the contributions of three main factors, the utilization patterns of each wolf territory, the spatial distribution of both prey species, and fine-scale landscape structure, in determining the spatial structure of moose and roe deer predation risk. The reestablished predator-prey system showed a remarkable spatial variation in kill occurrence at the intra-territorial level, with kill probabilities varying by several orders of magnitude inside the same territory. Variation in predation risk was evident also when a spatially homogeneous probability for a wolf to encounter a prey was simulated. Even inside the same territory, with the same landscape structure, and when exposed to predation by the same wolves, the two prey species experienced an opposite spatial distribution of predation risk. In particular, increased predation risk for moose was associated with open areas, especially clearcuts and young forest stands, whereas risk was lowered for roe deer in the same habitat types. Thus, fine-scale landscape structure can generate contrasting predation risk patterns in sympatric ungulates, so that they can experience large differences in the spatial distribution of risk and refuge areas when exposed to predation by a recolonizing predator. Territories with an earlier recolonization were not associated with a lower hunting success for wolves. Such constant efficiency in wolf predation during the recolonization process is in line with previous findings about the naive nature of Scandinavian moose to wolf predation. This, together with the human-dominated nature of the Scandinavian ecosystem, seems to limit the possibility for wolves to have large ecosystem effects and to establish a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade in Scandinavia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24261051     DOI: 10.1890/12-1615.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  15 in total

Review 1.  Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes.

Authors:  D P J Kuijper; E Sahlén; B Elmhagen; S Chamaillé-Jammes; H Sand; K Lone; J P G M Cromsigt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors.

Authors:  Jenny Mattisson; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Vincenzo Gervasi; Olof Liberg; John D C Linnell; Geir Rune Rauset; Hans Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  What drives wolf preference towards wild ungulates? Insights from a multi-prey system in the Slovak Carpathians.

Authors:  Nuno F Guimarães; Francisco Álvares; Jana Ďurová; Peter Urban; Jozef Bučko; Tomáš Iľko; Jaro Brndiar; Jozef Štofik; Tibor Pataky; Miroslava Barančeková; Rudolf Kropil; Peter Smolko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Testing the risk of predation hypothesis: the influence of recolonizing wolves on habitat use by moose.

Authors:  Kerry L Nicholson; Cyril Milleret; Johan Månsson; Håkan Sand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A Conservation-Based Approach to Compensation for Livestock Depredation: The Florida Panther Case Study.

Authors:  Caitlin E Jacobs; Martin B Main
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Landscape-scale accessibility of livestock to tigers: implications of spatial grain for modeling predation risk to mitigate human-carnivore conflict.

Authors:  Jennifer R B Miller; Yadvendradev V Jhala; Jyotirmay Jena; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Mapping the Relative Probability of Common Toad Occurrence in Terrestrial Lowland Farm Habitat in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Rosie D Salazar; Robert A Montgomery; Sarah E Thresher; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prey Selection of Scandinavian Wolves: Single Large or Several Small?

Authors:  Håkan Sand; Ann Eklund; Barbara Zimmermann; Camilla Wikenros; Petter Wabakken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mobility of moose-comparing the effects of wolf predation risk, reproductive status, and seasonality.

Authors:  Camilla Wikenros; Gyöngyvér Balogh; Håkan Sand; Kerry L Nicholson; Johan Månsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Where wolves kill moose: the influence of prey life history dynamics on the landscape ecology of predation.

Authors:  Robert A Montgomery; John A Vucetich; Gary J Roloff; Joseph K Bump; Rolf O Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.