PURPOSE: To describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the Multicontext Sitting Time Questionnaire (MSTQ). METHOD: During development of the MSTQ, contexts and domains of sitting behavior were utilized as recall cues to improve the accuracy of sitting assessment. The terms "workday" and "nonworkday" were used to disambiguate occupational and discretionary sitting. An expert panel evaluated content validity. Among 25 participants, test-retest reliability of the MSTQ items was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed versus relative and absolute accelerometer-estimated sedentary time and activity log using Pearson (r) or Spearman (p) correlation coefficients where appropriate. RESULTS: Pilot testing revealed Web-based MSTQ administration was rapid, scalable, and inexpensive. Most items in the MSTQ demonstrated acceptable reliability (ICCs > .70). Compared with accelerometer-estimated sedentary time relative to total wear time, the MSTQ exhibited a low correlation on workdays (r = .34) and a moderately high correlation on nonworkdays (r = .61). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic development of the MSTQ resulted in several improvements over previous tools and may serve as a model for purpose-driven questionnaire design. Additional validation is needed to conclusively determine the utility of the MSTQ.
PURPOSE: To describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the Multicontext Sitting Time Questionnaire (MSTQ). METHOD: During development of the MSTQ, contexts and domains of sitting behavior were utilized as recall cues to improve the accuracy of sitting assessment. The terms "workday" and "nonworkday" were used to disambiguate occupational and discretionary sitting. An expert panel evaluated content validity. Among 25 participants, test-retest reliability of the MSTQ items was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed versus relative and absolute accelerometer-estimated sedentary time and activity log using Pearson (r) or Spearman (p) correlation coefficients where appropriate. RESULTS: Pilot testing revealed Web-based MSTQ administration was rapid, scalable, and inexpensive. Most items in the MSTQ demonstrated acceptable reliability (ICCs > .70). Compared with accelerometer-estimated sedentary time relative to total wear time, the MSTQ exhibited a low correlation on workdays (r = .34) and a moderately high correlation on nonworkdays (r = .61). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic development of the MSTQ resulted in several improvements over previous tools and may serve as a model for purpose-driven questionnaire design. Additional validation is needed to conclusively determine the utility of the MSTQ.
Authors: Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee Journal: Sports Med Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M Van Middelkoop; J Kolkman; J Van Ochten; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Stella S Yi; Katherine F Bartley; Melanie J Firestone; Karen K Lee; Donna L Eisenhower Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Timothy J Walker; Natalia I Heredia; MinJae Lee; Susan T Laing; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Joseph B McCormick; Belinda M Reininger Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Casey P Durand; Abiodun O Oluyomi; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Deborah Salvo; Ipek N Sener; Deanna M Hoelscher; Gregory Knell; Xiaohui Tang; Anna K Porter; Michael C Robertson; Harold W Kohl Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2016-06-09
Authors: Esmée A Bakker; Yvonne A W Hartman; Maria T E Hopman; Nicola D Hopkins; Lee E F Graves; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Dick H J Thijssen Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Bethany Barone Gibbs; Joshua L Paley; Melissa A Jones; Kara M Whitaker; Christopher P Connolly; Janet M Catov Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 3.007