| Literature DB >> 24260409 |
Fuensanta García-Orenes1, Alicia Morugán-Coronado, Raul Zornoza, Artemi Cerdà, Kate Scow.
Abstract
Agricultural practices have proven to be unsuitable in many cases, causing considerable reductions in soil quality. Land management practices can provide solutions to this problem and contribute to get a sustainable agriculture model. The main objective of this work was to assess the effect of different agricultural management practices on soil microbial community structure (evaluated as abundance of phospholipid fatty acids, PLFA). Five different treatments were selected, based on the most common practices used by farmers in the study area (eastern Spain): residual herbicides, tillage, tillage with oats and oats straw mulching; these agricultural practices were evaluated against an abandoned land after farming and an adjacent long term wild forest coverage. The results showed a substantial level of differentiation in the microbial community structure, in terms of management practices, which was highly associated with soil organic matter content. Addition of oats straw led to a microbial community structure closer to wild forest coverage soil, associated with increases in organic carbon, microbial biomass and fungal abundances. The microbial community composition of the abandoned agricultural soil was characterised by increases in both fungal abundances and the metabolic quotient (soil respiration per unit of microbial biomass), suggesting an increase in the stability of organic carbon. The ratio of bacteria:fungi was higher in wild forest coverage and land abandoned systems, as well as in the soil treated with oat straw. The most intensively managed soils showed higher abundances of bacteria and actinobacteria. Thus, the application of organic matter, such as oats straw, appears to be a sustainable management practice that enhances organic carbon, microbial biomass and activity and fungal abundances, thereby changing the microbial community structure to one more similar to those observed in soils under wild forest coverage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24260409 PMCID: PMC3832375 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Main physical, chemical and biochemical properties measured in soils for each treatment.
| Management practices | ASa | Corg | N | C/N | WHC | P | Csol | BSR | Cmic | qCO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RH | 41±6 | 13.9±1.5a | 1.1±0.1a | 13.2±0.5 | 46.5±1.6a | 1.75±0.46a | 44.8±16.3a | 0.52±0.20a | 152±80a | 3.94±1.34 |
| T | 46±7 | 14.5±0.3a | 1.1±0.1a | 13.3±1.3 | 45.5±1.0a | 1.66±0.26a | 51.8±9.6a | 1.42±0.30b | 299±50a | 4.74±0.67 |
| OT | 50±7 | 14.4±0.9a | 1.2±0.0a | 13.3±0.2 | 46.8±7.3ab | 1.64±0.20a | 59.6±17.3a | 0.75±0.05ab | 180±83a | 4.79±2.07 |
| OS | 79±9 | 27.2±4.1b | 2.2±0.2b | 12.8±0.7 | 54.4±1.3bc | 3.63±0.34c | 125.8±46.3c | 2.35±0.37c | 576±171c | 3.85±1.38 |
| C | 66±4 | 18.2±1.8a | 1.7±0.1a | 13.4±0.3 | 48.9±1.5ab | 1.62±0.14a | 85.4±8.2b | 1.81±0.29bc | 329±70b | 5.89±0.67 |
| NC | 84±7 | 31.6±3.3b | 2.2±0.9b | 13.8±1.2 | 56.0±4.1c | 2.49±0.15b | 93.8±28.6bc | 2.40±0.13c | 400±167bc | 4.90±0.14 |
| F-valueb | 40.2** | 16.04** | 27.87** | 0.47 ns | 7.60* | 40.13** | 21.74** | 30.27** | 16.08** | 0.79 ns |
Values are the mean ± standard deviation.
a AS: aggregates stability (%); Corg: soil organic carbon (g kg-1); N: total Nitrogen (g k- 1); WHC: water holding capacity (%); P: Available Phosphorous (mg/kg), Csol: soluble organic carbon (mg kg-1); Cmic: microbial biomass carbon (mg C kg-1 soil); BSR: Basal soil respiration (mg C-CO2kg-1 h-1); qCO2: BSR/Cmic. bSignificant at: *P<0.05, **P<0.001; ns: not significant (P>0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among means.
Figure 1Samples and soil characteristics biplots (A) and loadings plots (B) from RDA performed on the relative concentration of PLFAs in all management practices:residual herbicide (♦), tillage (▲), oats+tillage (○), oats straw (●), land abandonment (□) and wild forest coverage (■).
PLFAs used for microbial groups designation are marked as: underlined (bacteria), framed (fungi), * (G- bacteria), + (G+ bacteria) and “ (actinobacteria). Corg: soil organic carbon; N: total nitrogen; Csol: soluble carbon; WHC: water holding capacity; AS: aggregate stability; Cmic: microbial biomass C; BSR: basal soil respiration; qCO2: BSR/Cmic.
Figure 2Values of total PLFAs biomass and various PLFA biomarkers (mean ± standard deviation) for all soil management practices.
A one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (P<0.05) were used to compare significant differences. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among management practices. G+: Gram positive; G-: Gram-negative.
Correlation coefficients (r-values) for relationships between physical, chemical and biochemical properties and PLFA biomarkers.
| Corg | N | C/N | Csol | WHC | AS | P | Cmic | BSR | qCO2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total PLFA | 0.88** | 0.92** | -0.059 | 0.83** | 0.80** | 0.88** | 0.73** | 0.80** | 0.68** | 0.07 |
| Fungi | 0.97** | 0.94** | 0.239 | 0.71** | 0.81** | 0.87** | 0.59** | 0.61** | 0.64** | 0.12 |
| Bacteria:Fungi | -0.74** | -0.75** | -0.049 | -0.69** | -0.70** | -0.88** | -0.52* | -0.53* | -0.76** | -0.35 |
| Bacteria | 0.85** | 0.91** | -0.141 | 0.85** | 0.77** | 0.86** | 0.82** | 0.85** | 0.67** | 0.04 |
| G- | 0.77** | 0.84** | -0.197 | 0.84** | 0.71** | 0.82** | 0.74** | 0.79** | 0.71** | 0.12 |
| G+ | 0.85** | 0.92** | -0.152 | 0.84** | 0.77** | 0.84** | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.65** | 0.02 |
| G-:G+ | 0.20 | 0.24 | -0.207 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.51* | 0.34 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.86** | 0.92** | -0.135 | 0.83** | 0.77** | 0.83** | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.60** | -0.02 |
Corg: soil organic carbon; N: total Nitrogen; Csol: soluble carbon; WHC: water holding capacity; AS: aggregate stability; Cmic: microbial biomass carbon; BSR: basal soil respiration; P: available phosphorus; G-: Gram-negative bacteria; G+: Gram-positive bacteria; * and ** indicate significant correlation at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.
Main characteristics of the study soil (0-5 cm depth).
| Texture (% sand, silt, clay)[ | 39, 38, 23 |
|---|---|
| pH (extract 1:5,w/v) | 8.3 ± 0.02 |
| Electrical conductivity (1:5, μS cm-1) | 185 ± 4.00 |
| CaCO3 (%) | 60 ± 3.00 |
| Total organic carbon (g kg-1) | 12.5 ± 0.10 |
| Soluble C (mg kg-1) | 74 ± 1.00 |
| Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1) | 270 ± 2.00 |
| Total N (g kg-1) | 0.78 ± 0.03 |
| Available P (mg kg-1) | 2.00 ± 0.01 |
| Extractable K (mg kg-1) | 303 ± 12.00 |
| Basal respiration rate (mg C-CO2 kg-1 h-1) | 1.55 ± 0.08 |
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n=20).
Sand: 2-0.02 mm, Silt: 0.02-0.002 mm, Clay: <0.002 mm.
Description of the different soil agricultural management practices.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RH | Residual herbicide | 3 applications per year of oxyfluorfen (240 g L-1); 1.5 kg ha-1 |
| T | Tillage | 4 times per year (tillage depth: 20 cm) |
| OT | Oats + Tillage | Tillage: 4 times per year; (tillage depth: 20 cm) Sown 100% oats (ground and added to soil in spring) |
| LA | Land abandonment | Abandoned field with natural plant recolonisation ( |
| OS | Oat straw | Amount: 0.25 kg m-2 yr-1, straw mulch weed chopped add on surface of the soil. |
| WF | Wild forest coverage | Adjacent non-cultivated area ( |
Biomarker indices investigated.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Bacteria | i15:0, 15:0, a15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω7, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0, 17:0, cy19:0 |
| Fungi | 18:2ω6 |
| G- bacteria | cy17:0, cy19:0, 17:1ω9c, 16:1ω7c, 18:1ω9c |
| G+ bacteria | i14:0, i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0 |
| Actinobacteria | 10Me17:0, 10Me18:0 |