| Literature DB >> 24260409 |
Fuensanta García-Orenes1, Alicia Morugán-Coronado, Raul Zornoza, Artemi Cerdà, Kate Scow.
Abstract
Agricultural practices haveEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24260409 PMCID: PMC3832375 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Main physical, chemical and biochemical properties measured in soils for each treatment.
| Management practices | ASa | Corg | N | C/N | WHC | P | Csol | BSR | Cmic | qCO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RH | 41±6 | 13.9±1.5a | 1.1±0.1a | 13.2±0.5 | 46.5±1.6a | 1.75±0.46a | 44.8±16.3a | 0.52±0.20a | 152±80a | 3.94±1.34 |
| T | 46±7 | 14.5±0.3a | 1.1±0.1a | 13.3±1.3 | 45.5±1.0a | 1.66±0.26a | 51.8±9.6a | 1.42±0.30b | 299±50a | 4.74±0.67 |
| OT | 50±7 | 14.4±0.9a | 1.2±0.0a | 13.3±0.2 | 46.8±7.3ab | 1.64±0.20a | 59.6±17.3a | 0.75±0.05ab | 180±83a | 4.79±2.07 |
| OS | 79±9 | 27.2±4.1b | 2.2±0.2b | 12.8±0.7 | 54.4±1.3bc | 3.63±0.34c | 125.8±46.3c | 2.35±0.37c | 576±171c | 3.85±1.38 |
| C | 66±4 | 18.2±1.8a | 1.7±0.1a | 13.4±0.3 | 48.9±1.5ab | 1.62±0.14a | 85.4±8.2b | 1.81±0.29bc | 329±70b | 5.89±0.67 |
| NC | 84±7 | 31.6±3.3b | 2.2±0.9b | 13.8±1.2 | 56.0±4.1c | 2.49±0.15b | 93.8±28.6bc | 2.40±0.13c | 400±167bc | 4.90±0.14 |
| F-valueb | 40.2** | 16.04** | 27.87** | 0.47 ns | 7.60* | 40.13** | 21.74** | 30.27** | 16.08** | 0.79 ns |
Values are the mean ± standard deviation.
a AS: aggregates stability (%); Corg: soil organic carbon (g kg-1); N: total Nitrogen (g k- 1); WHC: water holding capacity (%); P: Available Phosphorous (mg/kg), Csol: soluble organic carbon (mg kg-1); Cmic: microbial biomass carbon (mg C kg-1 soil); BSR: Basal soil respiration (mg C-CO2kg-1 h-1); qCO2: BSR/Cmic. bSignificant at: *P<0.05, **P<0.001; ns: not significant (P>0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among means.
Figure 1Samples and soil characteristics biplots (A) and loadings plots (B) from RDA performed on the relative concentration of PLFAs in all management practices:residual herbicide (♦), tillage (▲), oats+tillage (○), oats straw (●), land abandonment (□) and wild forest coverage (■).
PLFAs used for microbial groups designation are marked as: underlined (bacteria), framed (fungi), * (G- bacteria), + (G+ bacteria) and “ (actinobacteria). Corg: soil organic carbon; N: total nitrogen; Csol: soluble carbon; WHC: water holding capacity; AS: aggregate stability; Cmic: microbial biomass C; BSR: basal soil respiration; qCO2: BSR/Cmic.
Figure 2Values of total PLFAs biomass and various PLFA biomarkers (mean ± standard deviation) for all soil management practices.
A one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (P<0.05) were used to compare significant differences. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among management practices. G+: Gram positive; G-: Gram-negative.
Correlation coefficients (r-values) for relationships between physical, chemical and biochemical properties and PLFA biomarkers.
| Corg | N | C/N | Csol | WHC | AS | P | Cmic | BSR | qCO2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total PLFA | 0.88** | 0.92** | -0.059 | 0.83** | 0.80** | 0.88** | 0.73** | 0.80** | 0.68** | 0.07 |
| Fungi | 0.97** | 0.94** | 0.239 | 0.71** | 0.81** | 0.87** | 0.59** | 0.61** | 0.64** | 0.12 |
| Bacteria:Fungi | -0.74** | -0.75** | -0.049 | -0.69** | -0.70** | -0.88** | -0.52* | -0.53* | -0.76** | -0.35 |
| Bacteria | 0.85** | 0.91** | -0.141 | 0.85** | 0.77** | 0.86** | 0.82** | 0.85** | 0.67** | 0.04 |
| G- | 0.77** | 0.84** | -0.197 | 0.84** | 0.71** | 0.82** | 0.74** | 0.79** | 0.71** | 0.12 |
| G+ | 0.85** | 0.92** | -0.152 | 0.84** | 0.77** | 0.84** | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.65** | 0.02 |
| G-:G+ | 0.20 | 0.24 | -0.207 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.51* | 0.34 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.86** | 0.92** | -0.135 | 0.83** | 0.77** | 0.83** | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.60** | -0.02 |
Corg: soil organic carbon; N: total Nitrogen; Csol: soluble carbon; WHC: water holding capacity; AS: aggregate stability; Cmic: microbial biomass carbon; BSR: basal soil respiration; P: available phosphorus; G-: Gram-negative bacteria; G+: Gram-positive bacteria; * and ** indicate significant correlation at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.
Main characteristics of the study soil (0-5 cm depth).
| Texture (% sand, silt, clay)[ | 39, 38, 23 |
|---|---|
| pH (extract 1:5,w/v) | 8.3 ± 0.02 |
| Electrical conductivity (1:5, μS cm-1) | 185 ± 4.00 |
| CaCO3 (%) | 60 ± 3.00 |
| Total organic carbon (g kg-1) | 12.5 ± 0.10 |
| Soluble C (mg kg-1) | 74 ± 1.00 |
| Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1) | 270 ± 2.00 |
| Total N (g kg-1) | 0.78 ± 0.03 |
| Available P (mg kg-1) | 2.00 ± 0.01 |
| Extractable K (mg kg-1) | 303 ± 12.00 |
| Basal respiration rate (mg C-CO2 kg-1 h-1) | 1.55 ± 0.08 |
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n=20).
Sand: 2-0.02 mm, Silt: 0.02-0.002 mm, Clay: <0.002 mm.
Description of the different soil agricultural management practices.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RH | Residual herbicide | 3 applications per year of oxyfluorfen (240 g L-1); 1.5 kg ha-1 |
| T | Tillage | 4 times per year (tillage depth: 20 cm) |
| OT | Oats + Tillage | Tillage: 4 times per year; (tillage depth: 20 cm) Sown 100% oats (ground and added to soil in spring) |
| LA | Land abandonment | Abandoned field with natural plant recolonisation ( |
| OS | Oat straw | Amount: 0.25 kg m-2 yr-1, straw mulch weed chopped add on surface of the soil. |
| WF | Wild forest coverage | Adjacent non-cultivated area ( |
Biomarker indices investigated.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Bacteria | i15:0, 15:0, a15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω7, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0, 17:0, cy19:0 |
| Fungi | 18:2ω6 |
| G- bacteria | cy17:0, cy19:0, 17:1ω9c, 16:1ω7c, 18:1ω9c |
| G+ bacteria | i14:0, i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0 |
| Actinobacteria | 10Me17:0, 10Me18:0 |