Literature DB >> 24259935

Effect of the Foot Placements on the Latissmus Dorsi and Low Back Muscle Activities during Pull-down Exercise.

Won-Gyu Yoo1.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of foot placement on the latissmus dorsi and low back muscles activities during pull-down exercise. [Subjects] For this study, we recruited 10 male volunteers. [Methods] The subjects performed pull-down exercises with 4 foot placement conditions. The activities of the latissmus dorsi and L4 paraspinal muscles were measured.
[Results] The activities of the latissmus dorsi muscles significantly increased in the order of conditions 1 and 2 < condition 4 < condition 3. The activities of the L4 paraspinal muscles were significantly different, with the activities of conditions 1 and 2 being greater than those of conditions 3 and 4.
[Conclusion] We suggest that the selection of foot placement is an important factor for the effective strengthening of the latissmus dorsi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foot placement; Latissmus dorsi; Pull-down exercise

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259935      PMCID: PMC3818746          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

The latissmus dorsi muscle contributes to shoulder adduction, internal rotation, and extension, and it directly connects the upper extremity and trunk1, 2). Because of its importance, researchers have investigated the merits of several exercise methods and instruments for the activation of the latissmus dorsi3). Representative exercises for strengthening the latissimus dorsi are pull down, pull up, and rowing exercises. Previous studies which investigated the latissmus dorsi muscle activation have reported that it depends on grip width, expert instruction, and forearm orientation3,4,5). Signorile et al.5) reported that a wide handgrip position produces a greater latissmus dorsi muscle activation than other handgrip positions. Sperandei et al.6) investigated three positions of pull down, the scapular plane, the frontal plane using a V-shaped bar, and the behind the neck position. Clinical studies have also used different methods for the measurement of latissmus dorsi4, 5). Pull down in the standing position and body lifting in the seated position have commonly been used to activate the latissmus dorsi4,5,6). However, no study has investigated the effect of foot placement on the latissmus dorsi and low back muscle activities during pull-down exercise. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of foot placement on the latissmus dorsi and low back muscle activities during pull-down exercise.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study subjects were 10 males aged 20–27 years (23.2 ± 3.2 years, mean±SD) whose average height and weight were 175.6 ± 2.3 cm and 66.2 ± 4.6 kg, respectively. The subjects had no history of musculoskeletal disorders or pain associated with the upper extremity in the past 6 months. The EMG data were collected using a Biopac MP150WSW (Biopac System, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Surface electrodes were placed at an oblique angle over the latissmus dorsi muscle on the right side, approximately 4 cm below the inferior tip of the scapula and midway between the spine and lateral edge of the torso, and for the L4 paraspinal muscle on the right side 2 cm, laterally from the L4 spinous process. The subjects performed pull-down exercises with 4 foot placement conditions. Condition 1 was standing with their feet one shoulder-width apart, condition 2 was standing with their feet 120% shoulder-width apart, condition 3 was standing with the right foot placed anteriorly and the left foot posteriorly one shoulder-width apart, and condition 4 was standing with the left foot placed anteriorly and the right foot posteriorly one shoulder-width apart. From the standing position, subjects grasped the two bar of pulley. Subjects then tried to pull-down with their arms, caudally, without flexing the elbow or depressing the shoulder. The exercise load was the 50% of the body weight7). Each isometric exertion was maintained for 5 seconds, and the middle of three seconds was used for further analysis. Data were normalized as percentages of the maximal voluntary isometric contractions value against normalized data. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Bonferroni correction was performed to identify specific differences between multiple pairwise comparisons among the 4 conditions. The results were considered significant for values of p < 0.05, and SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The activities of the latissmus dorsi muscles significantly increased in the order of conditions 1 (45.9 ± 13.3%) and 2 (42.9 ± 12.3%) < condition 4 (52.0 ± 12.0%) < condition 3 (56.2 ± 10.2%) (p<0.05). The EMG activities of the L4 paraspinal muscles were significantly different, with the activities of condition 1 (46.2 ±16.0%) and condition 2 (49.5 ±19.6%) being significantly greater than those of condition 3 (33.8 ±11.7%) and condition 4 (36.5 ±15.5%) (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the effects of foot placement on the latissmus dorsi and low back muscle activities during pull-down exercise. Our results show that the activities of the latissmus dorsi muscles significantly increased in the order of conditions 1 and 2 < condition 4 < condition 3. Condition 3 was standing with the right foot placed anteriorly and the left foot posteriorly one shoulder-width apart. The latissmus dorsi is a very broad muscle that originates at the lower six thoracic vertebrae, the lumbodorsal fascia, the sacrum, and the blade of the ilium; it inserts, along with the teres major, on the medial edge of the humerus1,2,3). A previous study showed that extension of the ipsilateral leg generates gluteus maximus activity, which tightens the thoracolumbar fascia. The stress of the thoracolumar fascia is transmitted to the ipsilateral latissmus dorsi8). Our results also show that the activities of the L4 paraspinal muscles were significantly different, with conditions 1 and 2 being significantly higher than those of conditions 3 and 4. According to recent reports, continuous exercise training with poor posture or method can result in low back pain7,8,9). Subjects with LBP have been shown to have altered trunk muscle activation patterns which are activated highly in L4-L5 level back muscles10). Foot placement is associated with the size of the base of support (BOS) of the body9). Pull-down exercise requires anterior-posterior translation along the line of the center of gravity of body9). Therefore, we suggest that the selection of foot placement is an important factor for effective strengthening of the latissmus dorsi.
  9 in total

1.  A comparative electromyographical investigation of muscle utilization patterns using various hand positions during the lat pull-down.

Authors:  Joseph F Signorile; Attila J Zink; Steven P Szwed
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Jacek Cholewicki; Andrea Radebold
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Voluntary increase in latissimus dorsi muscle activity during the lat pull-down following expert instruction.

Authors:  Benjamin J Snyder; James R Leech
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Electromyographic analysis of three different types of lat pull-down.

Authors:  Sandro Sperandei; Marcos A P Barros; Paulo C S Silveira-Júnior; Carlos G Oliveira
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Enhancing the weight training experience: a comparison of limb kinematics and EMG activity on three machines.

Authors:  Yasushi Koyama; Hirofumi Kobayashi; Shuji Suzuki; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Grip width and forearm orientation effects on muscle activity during the lat pull-down.

Authors:  Stephen J Lusk; Bruce D Hale; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Functional evaluation of the shoulder following latissimus dorsi muscle transfer.

Authors:  F O Fraulin; G Louie; L Zorrilla; W Tilley
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Electromyographic analysis of knee push up plus variations: what is the influence of the kinetic chain on scapular muscle activity?

Authors:  A Maenhout; K Van Praet; L Pizzi; M Van Herzeele; A Cools
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Variations in muscle activation levels during traditional latissimus dorsi weight training exercises: An experimental study.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman; Day Deans Buchan; Angela Lundy; Nicole Myers; Andrea Nalborczyk
Journal:  Dyn Med       Date:  2004-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.