| Literature DB >> 24259927 |
Yong-Kyu Choi1, Chan-Woo Nam, Jung-Ho Lee, Young-Han Park.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of taping on the articular angle of the knee joint and on the functioning of patients with hemiplegia resulting from stroke. [Subjects] The subjects of this study were 30 patients who were diagnosed with hemiplegia due to stroke. The subjects were randomly assigned to either an experimental group which received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combination patterns and kinesio taping were applied, or a control group which received neurodevelopmental treatment. [Methods] Joint angle was measured at the hip and the ankle for both the paretic and non-paretic sides using a goniometer. Dynamic balance ability was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale. Gait velocity was measured as the 10-m walking time using a stopwatch.Entities:
Keywords: Hemiplegia; Kinesio taping; Stroke
Year: 2013 PMID: 24259927 PMCID: PMC3818771 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.1119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General characteristics of subjects (Mean ± SD)
| Experimental group | Control group | |
| Age (yr) | 53.4 ± 9.5 | 54.1 ± 8.6 |
| Height (cm) | 174.6 ± 12.6 | 171.3 ± 13.7 |
| Weight (kg) | 58.9 ± 7.4 | 59.8 ± 8.6 |
| Gender (M / F) | 8/7 | 7/8 |
| Affected side (L / R) | 9/6 | 8/7 |
*p<0.05
Pre-test and post-test comparison of the experimental group (Mean ± SD)
| Experimental group (n=15) | Control group (n=15) | |||
| Pre-test | Post-test | Pre-test | Post-test | |
| Hip flexion (°) | 117.3 ± 12.5 | 121.3 ± 8.5 | 119.0 ± 10.3 | 120.5 ± 7.4 |
| Hip extension (°) | 9.3 ± 2.5 | 11.6 ± 1.2 | 9.6 ± 1.2 | 10.5 ± 1.3 |
| Ankle dorsiflexion (°) | 10.3 ± 5.3 | 12.6 ± 11.8 | 9.3 ± 6.2 | 11.2 ± 4.5 |
| Ankle plantar flexion (°) | 44.0 ± 8.0 | 46.0 ± 10.5 | 41.0 ± 7.1 | 43.3 ± 2.4 |
| BBS | 27.8 ± 7.9 | 29.4 ± 6.8* | 29.1 ± 6.4 | 30.0 ± 5.9 |
| 10 m (sec) | 40.4 ± 26.5 | 36.6 ± 25.9* | 38.2 ± 17.2 | 36.8 ± 3.5* |
p<0.05, Unit=score, BBS=Berg balance scale, 10 m=10 meter walking time
Comparison of ROM, BBS, and 10 m gait between the groups (Mean ± SD)
| Experimental group | Control group | |
| Hip flexion (°) | –1.17 ± 3.40 | –2.33 ± 4.58 |
| Hip extension (°) | –0.33 ± 1.29 | –0.593 ± 1.35 |
| Ankle dorsiflexion (°)* | –3.00 ± 4.55 | –4.33 ± 11.93 |
| Ankle plantar flexion (°) | –2.00 ± 9.96 | –2.33 ± 6.78 |
| BBS* | –1.67 ± 3.04 | –0.93 ± 1.16 |
| 10 m (sec)* | 2.80 ± 2.46 | 2.00 ± 5.78 |
*p<0.05, Unit=score, BBS=Berg balance scale, 10 m=10 meter walking time